> Do you have enough feedback to declare WG consensus on this issue?=20
I think so - pls go ahead
Scott
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Juergen, Scott,
Do you have enough feedback to declare WG consensus on this issue?
Can we expect a new I-D before the pre-Dublin submission cutoff on
Monday?
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juergen Sch
Hi -
> From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "David Harrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'Randy Presuhn'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'General Area Review Team'"
> ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:59 AM
> Subject: Re:
> [OPSAWG]Gen-ARTLC
a+b
dbh
> -Original Message-
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:00 PM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: 'Randy Presuhn'; 'General Area Review Team';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
> [OPSAWG]Gen-ARTLCreviewo
Speaking as a contributor I support option b) - (actually a+b)
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:00 AM
> To: David Harrington
> Cc: 'General Area Review Team'; [EMAIL PRO
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:56:14AM +0800, David Harrington wrote:
> I think the benefit to operators is greater than the risk of giving
> the same benefit to attackers. I am not convinced this information is
> sensitive.
I though security considerations should spell out potential risks so
that p
Hi,
Just a touch of perspective.
I joined the SNMP community because SNMPv2-party was so secure,
network management applications would no longer be able to do
autodiscovery of SNMP-capable devices. The autodiscovery we wanted to
be able to do included being able to detect what type of device it w
