Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-20 Thread Hui Deng
Lemon Cc: Giyeong Son; Hui Deng; dhc WG; gen-art@ietf.org; mif; i...@ietf.org; black_da...@emc.com Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00 Yup ... there is currently no way to provide authenticated, meaningful identification of the network(s) to which a host

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-16 Thread Ted Lemon
On 2009/4/13 Ralph Droms rdr...@cisco.com wrote: For example, would a host process information received from a Starbucks network over its 802.11 interface differently from information received a home network over the 802.11 interface? It's even more fun than that. How do we reliably know

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-16 Thread Ralph Droms
Yup ... there is currently no way to provide authenticated, meaningful identification of the network(s) to which a host is attached. Without that identification, it's pretty hard to write any reasonable policies. - Ralph On Apr 16, 2009, at 1:26 PM 4/16/09, Ted Lemon wrote: On 2009/4/13

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-16 Thread Giyeong Son
...@cisco.com] Sent: April 16, 2009 1:32 PM To: Ted Lemon Cc: Giyeong Son; Hui Deng; dhc WG; gen-art@ietf.org; mif; i...@ietf.org; black_da...@emc.com Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [mif] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00 Yup ... there is currently no way to provide authenticated, meaningful