Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-21 Thread Lizhong Jin
This email is to send the review discussion to PWE3 list as the request from AD. Thanks Lizhong Lizhong Jin wrote 2012/06/21 22:43:54: > Hi Elwyn, > Please see inline below. > > Thanks > Lizhong > > Elwyn Davies wrote 2012/06/21 20:38:27: > > > Hi, Lizhong. > > > > I have removed the bit

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-21 Thread Stewart Bryant
Please can you continue this conversation with the PWE3 WG in the cc list so that it has the correct level of expert oversight. Thanks Stewart On 21/06/2012 15:43, Lizhong Jin wrote: Hi Elwyn, Please see inline below. Thanks Lizhong Elwyn Davies wrote 2012/06/21 20:38:27: > Hi, Lizhong.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-21 Thread Lizhong Jin
Hi Elwyn, Please see inline below. Thanks Lizhong Elwyn Davies wrote 2012/06/21 20:38:27: > Hi, Lizhong. > > I have removed the bits that we are agreed on to shorten the mail a bit. > > I don't think we have converged just yet. > > Regards, > Elwyn > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 01:17 +0800, Li

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-21 Thread Stewart Bryant
Bringing this to the attention of the PWE3 WG since that need to know that this discussion is happening and will have a view as to what is already well known in terms of RFC4447 behavior and what needs clarification via this draft. Stewart On 21/06/2012 13:38, Elwyn Davies wrote: Hi, Lizhong.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-21 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi, Lizhong. I have removed the bits that we are agreed on to shorten the mail a bit. I don't think we have converged just yet. Regards, Elwyn On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 01:17 +0800, Lizhong Jin wrote: > > Hi Elwyn, > Thank you for the prompt reply. See inline below. > > Lizhong > > > Elwyn

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-19 Thread Lizhong Jin
Hi Elwyn, Thank you for the prompt reply. See inline below. Lizhong Elwyn Davies wrote 2012/06/19 23:16:08: > Hi, Lizhong. > > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:48 +0800, Lizhong Jin wrote: > > > > Hi Elwyn, > > Thank you for the review. It seems you are reviewing v-03, not v-04, > > but some comme

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-19 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi, Lizhong. On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:48 +0800, Lizhong Jin wrote: > > Hi Elwyn, > Thank you for the review. It seems you are reviewing v-03, not v-04, > but some comments are for v-04. I am confused. Yes, I started reviewing v03 but had to stop because of other tasks and came back to v04. I th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-19 Thread Lizhong Jin
Hi Elwyn, Thank you for the review. It seems you are reviewing v-03, not v-04, but some comments are for v-04. I am confused. See my reply inline below. Regards Lizhong Elwyn Davies wrote 2012/06/19 20:12:17: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART,

[Gen-art] Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04

2012-06-19 Thread Elwyn Davies
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-cbit-negotiation-04.