Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-05 Thread Ryoo, Jeong-dong
-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Hi, Regarding the mode and capability discussion, please see if the following change can resolve the issue: Section 9.2 OLD: A mode is a given set of Capabilities. Modes are shorthand; referring

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-05 Thread Ryoo, Jeong-dong
Hi, In order to find correct text to reflect the comments that are agreed so far, I am suggesting the text below. Please, see inlines starting with [JR] I erased the parts that do not need further discussion. s8, definition of Exercise (EXER): Describing EXER as 'replacing' one of NR, RR

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-05 Thread George Swallow (swallow)
Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Hello Elwyn, Thanks for your reply. See my responses in-line [Huub3]. = On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:39 +, Huub Van Helvoort wrote: Hello Elwyn, Please find my response in-line [Huub2] To avoid any confusion I have snipped

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-05 Thread Eric Gray
See below… From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ryoo, Jeong-dong Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:00 AM To: Huub Van Helvoort; Elwyn Davies Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-05 Thread Ryoo, Jeong-dong
@tools.ietf.org Subject : RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt See below… From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ryoo, Jeong-dong Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:00 AM To: Huub Van Helvoort; Elwyn Davies Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-04 Thread Ryoo, Jeong-dong
...@dial.pipex.com Cc : General Area Review Team gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject : RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Hello Elwyn, Thanks for your reply. See my responses in-line [Huub3

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-04 Thread Eric Gray
, February 26, 2014 2:58 PM To: Elwyn Davies Cc: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Hello Elwyn, Thanks for your reply. See my responses in-line [Huub3]. = On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:39 +, Huub

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-04 Thread Eric Gray
: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Shwmae Adrian, You wrote: [snip] Politics! OK - How about we add to either s9.1.1 or s9.2 something like: I don't think it is politics at all, and I

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-04 Thread Eric Gray
-mpls-tp-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Hi, Huub. Thanks for the responses: Agreed bits snipped again. On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:39 +, Huub Van Helvoort wrote: Hello Elwyn, Please find my response in-line [Huub2

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-03-04 Thread Eric Gray
-psc-itu@tools.ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt Hi, Regarding the mode and capability discussion, please see if the following change can resolve the issue: Section 9.2 OLD: A mode is a given set of Capabilities. Modes are shorthand; referring

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-02-26 Thread Huub Van Helvoort
Hello Elwyn, Please find my response in-line [Huub2] To avoid any confusion I have snipped the parts that do not need further expanation. Minor issues: s1, next to last para: This document describes the behavior of the PSC protocol including the priority logic and the state

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-02-26 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi, Huub. Thanks for the responses: Agreed bits snipped again. On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:39 +, Huub Van Helvoort wrote: Hello Elwyn, Please find my response in-line [Huub2] To avoid any confusion I have snipped the parts that do not need further expanation. Minor issues: s1,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-02-26 Thread Adrian Farrel
Sut mae, Elwyn-gwas, [snip] Politics! OK - How about we add to either s9.1.1 or s9.2 something like: I don't think it is politics at all, and I don't really like that Huub referenced this as IETF and ITU-T since both documents are IETF standards track work. There are some people who want to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-02-25 Thread Elwyn Davies
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 21:50 +, Huub Van Helvoort wrote: Hello Elwyn, Thank you for your review. See my response in-line [Huub] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-02.txt

2014-02-24 Thread Huub Van Helvoort
Hello Elwyn, Thank you for your review. See my response in-line [Huub] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call