From: Katherine Casey
> My guess would be that the "open to" bit is intended to bring in people
who might otherwise feel they're not welcome if they're not
specifically invited,
more than it's intended to dis-invite people who already know they're
always welcome at Wikimedia events.
From: Jeremy Ba
*"I doubt I'd attend any event purporting to recruit women that
nevertheless limited itself to "people who were born female"; that's very
much a type of exclusion I'm uncomfortable with. In general, however,
there's nothing stopping you or anyone else from arranging a women-centric
(or even women-o
I doubt I'd attend any event purporting to recruit women that nevertheless
limited itself to "people who were born female"; that's very much a type of
exclusion I'm uncomfortable with. In general, however, there's nothing
stopping you or anyone else from arranging a women-centric (or even
women-onl
See also this article: "AfroCrowd: The Black Wikipedia For People of
African Descent" http://kreyolicious.com/afrocrowd/17531/
One of the drawbacks of GLAM is that people are just making a few edits,
and leaving, rather than becoming long-term editors. There may be chances
for followup here that w
>Yes, the idea is to be extra inclusionary by reaching out to all these groups
>explicitly, and in particular to representing >different cultural identities
>in rather non-monolithic African American / African Diasporic communities.
~
Yes, the idea is to be extra inclusionary by reaching out to all these
groups explicitly, and in particular to representing different cultural
identities in rather non-monolithic African American / African Diasporic
communities.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Baron
wrote
From a UK perspective, I have been to and helped to run a couple of
women-based editathons, they were mainly attended by women but were
never intended to be exclusive. There have also been a couple of black
history editathons in London, again they were not exclusive to any
particular group. I ran t
On Mar 23, 2015 11:41 AM, "Katherine Casey"
wrote:
> I recognize at least some of the names on the attendance list there as
people who don't, to the best of my knowledge, identify as being of African
descent, so it doesn't appear to have been an event that excluded anyone.
I think that wording wa
If someone started "WomenCROWD" it would be interesting to see if the
other "Crowd" meetups would support it. (AfroCROWD, HaitiCROWD,
AfroLatinoCROWD, AfricaCROWD) Not that I think it's necessary, but it
would be interesting to see the reaction. And I am curious as to what
pushback they might h
On Mar 23, 2015 11:25 AM, "Neotarf" wrote:
> I've never seen editithons that exclude people before. I've been to a
couple of black history events, and all were welcomed, although of course
there was a very high proportion of African descent.
I think the point was actually to be extra inclusionar
I recognize at least some of the names on the attendance list there as
people who don't, to the best of my knowledge, identify as being of African
descent, so it doesn't appear to have been an event that excluded anyone.
My guess would be that the "open to" bit is intended to bring in people who
mi
That's interesting:
"The workshops are open to all Afrodescendants including but not limited to
individuals who self-identify as African, African-American, Afro-Latino,
Biracial, Black, Black-American, Caribbean, Garifuna, Haitian or West
Indian."
I've never seen editithons that exclude people be
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia_Day_2015
Wikipedia Day NYC 2015 is a celebration and mini-conference for the
project's 14th birthday,* to be held on Sunday March 22, 2015, hosted at
Barnard College starting at 10:00 am, and also supported by Wikimedia
New York City
13 matches
Mail list logo
