On 25-03-2005 17:25, "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ehm, no, I don't think so. And we actually gained some memory. I'm hoping
>> that gump will be completely moving onto several vmware instances and some
>> solaris zones. (FYI, the solaris machine has stuff like 32GB of RAM. It's
>
> Ehm, no, I don't think so. And we actually gained some memory. I'm hoping
> that gump will be completely moving onto several vmware instances and some
> solaris zones. (FYI, the solaris machine has stuff like 32GB of RAM. It's
an
> animal). That will free brutus up for other stuff.
That works fo
Ehm, so I killed all gump and forrest stuff again so I can run proper
backups. Seems we might be in a little bit of a hurry...
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25-03-2005 14:43, "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The mailserver (hermes) has been flaky since we did the colo move. Some
> bits
>> of brutus may be required to fix it, which means we may have more
> downtime.
>> Sorry :/
>
> Are there any backups/snapshots of Brutus (configurat
> The mailserver (hermes) has been flaky since we did the colo move. Some
bits
> of brutus may be required to fix it, which means we may have more
downtime.
> Sorry :/
Are there any backups/snapshots of Brutus (configurations, installs,
whatever) that we can/should take in case we end up loosing s
