Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the
documentation is lacking for hadoop.
Can someone please provide be a use case, for example:
#server 1
Input > script.sh
Output > rack01
#server 2
Input > script.sh
Output > rack02
Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with
More like the following (shown with the bash prompt). You could type
this for testing. However, ultimately, hadoop itself will actually be
executing this script and reading its output.
$ ./script.sh server1.mydomain
rack1
$ ./script.sh server2.mydomain
rack1
$ ./script.sh server3.mydomain
rack2
$
On 3/19/10 4:32 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote:
> Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the
> documentation is lacking for hadoop.
>
> Can someone please provide be a use case, for example:
>
> #server 1
> Input > script.sh
> Output > rack01
>
> #server 2
> Input > script.sh
> O
Could someone clarify the position on the 0.21 release?
This thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201002.mbox/>
kind of died out (it seems) without any resolution.
I saw two suggestions: Rebase 0.21 against trunk and then try to
release, and I also saw release 0.21
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
> ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. Was
> there a final decision on this off list?
>
On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for
releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what is in current 0.21
Thank you for your reply,
So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS sync/flush/
append functionality?
You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best
idea, with your preference being a patch set against 0.20.
We definitely have an application for this speci
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
> Thank you for your reply,
>
> So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS
> sync/flush/append functionality?
> You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea,
> with your preference being a patch set aga
I want to bring up the issue about shuffler from thread:
Shuffle In Memory OutOfMemoryError
I was expecting improved performance from MAPREDUCE-1182
That would be one of the reasons for people to try out 0.21 release
Regards
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote:
> So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS sync/flush/append
> functionality?
> You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, with
> your preference being a patch set against 0.20.
>
There'll be a ha
