Re: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-07 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 6/7/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It just doesn't make sense to me to tell a community that believes it has >> a "1.0" quality product that they have to call it a "test snapshot". > > Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal? All of those terms (or at least the fi

RE: Biological Object Model Project

2005-06-07 Thread James Carman
I meant "biological object model project." Sorry. -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:35 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Biological Object Model Project All, I would like to start a biological object model proce

Biological Object Model Project

2005-06-07 Thread James Carman
All, I would like to start a biological object model process (I need to come up with a catchier name) and I think ASF would be a great place for it. I currently work with a product called GKP (Genomics Knowledge Platform) from a company called Xteric and it works fairly well, but it is not ope

Re: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-07 Thread Erik Abele
On 07.06.2005, at 22:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal? Look, maybe this is hard to understand, especially if people are coming from an enviroment focused on code quality first, but this isn't about the state of the code. It is about the state of

RE: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-07 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Cliff Schmidt wrote: > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+R equirements > > Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official Release. > > Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans are OK.

Re: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-07 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 6/7/05, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+Requirements > > > Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official Release. > Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans are OK

Re: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-07 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Cliff Schmidt wrote: > Here is my opinion on the whole release issue, which has not changed > in 18 months since the first big discussion of releases and incubation > branding. [snip] Maybe folks are confused by this sentence in the 'Minimum Exit Requirements' section. http://incubator.apache.

Re: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-07 Thread Cliff Schmidt
Here is my opinion on the whole release issue, which has not changed in 18 months since the first big discussion of releases and incubation branding. Full Disclosure: While this is my opinion as a member of the Incubator PMC, it is not necessarily the consensus of the PMC. In addition, I was onc