Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

2013-11-10 Thread larry mccay
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote: The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the discussion, we have chosen a new

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-29 Thread Larry McCay
Jake, thank you for taking care of that! I didn't see anything on the Knox mailing list - should I have? Can you tell me exactly what was fixed and where? We will be sure to investigate what went wrong and document the proper procedure going forward. Is there anything that is outstanding that

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

2013-10-01 Thread larry mccay
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Lieven Govaerts lieven.govae...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service stack for web mobile applications based on

Re: The podling initial committers issue

2013-09-25 Thread larry mccay
I was under the impression that what you describe was the policy - if it is not then is should certainly be clarified. In the event that podlings continue to or are to be given such a choice, I believe that there needs to be a clear understanding between the incoming community and those

Re: The podling initial committers issue

2013-09-25 Thread larry mccay
that it is anyone's fault or anyone is right or wrong. We just need the champion/mentor survey questions established. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:33 PM, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: That shared understanding seems

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-24 Thread larry mccay
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! I would be interested in being a committer on user-grid due to the synergies that seem possible between Apache Knox (incubating) and user-grid. If this is something that you would welcome then I would be happy to join as an initial committer. Regardless, good luck

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

2013-08-06 Thread Larry McCay
+1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

2013-07-31 Thread larry mccay
Correction: I am a member of the PPMC for Knox - sorry for the typo in my previous reply. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote: Hi Shreepadma - Interesting work. Given some more diversity on the mentor list, I would give a +1. Being on the IPMC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

2013-07-30 Thread Larry McCay
Hi Shreepadma - Interesting work. Given some more diversity on the mentor list, I would give a +1. Being on the IPMC for Knox, I can easily imagine Sentry and Knox being complementary to each other and look forward to contributing to and/or leveraging this work within Knox. I'd be interested

Re: [MENTOR] Re: Missing Release Distribution in Clutch Status?

2013-06-22 Thread larry mccay
++ -Original Message- From: larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com Reply-To: d...@knox.incubator.apache.org d...@knox.incubator.apache.org Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:46 AM To: d...@knox.incubator.apache.org d...@knox.incubator.apache.org Subject: [MENTOR] Re

<    1   2