Hi everyone,
Apache Beam entered incubation in early February. Over the past 10 months,
the podling has made great progress across various areas: refactoring the
project to remove any special treatment given to a runner or a vendor,
building processes that encourage open development, evangelizing t
The project looks to be ready to graduate. The traffic on the dev list shows a
community that is in good shape. Thanks for completing the maturity assessment
— it helped me assess the state of the project.
Julian
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> Apache Be
I have been very impressed with the efforts (and the success) of the Apache
Beam project in building community. This is definitely an example of Things
Done Right (tm).
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> The project looks to be ready to graduate. The traffic on the dev list
>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Apache Beam entered incubation in early February. Over the past 10 months,
> the podling has made great progress across various areas: refactoring the
> project to remove any special treatment given to a runner or a vendor,
> bu
>
> > * PMC composition:
> > * Tyler Akidau , Google
> > * Davor Bonaci , Google
> > * Robert Bradshaw , Google
> > * Ben Chambers , Google
> > * Luke Cwik , Google
> > * Stephan Ewen , data Artisans
> > * Dan Halperin , Google
> >
Hi Roman,
The affiliation for the proposed PMC members is:
* Tyler Akidau : Google
* Davor Bonaci : Google
* Robert Bradshaw : Google
* Ben Chambers : Google
* Luke Cwik : Google
* Stephan Ewen : dataArtisan
* Dan Halperin : Google
* Kenneth Knowles : Google
* Aljoscha Krettek : dataArtisan
* Ma
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> The affiliation for the proposed PMC members is:
>
> * Tyler Akidau : Google
> * Davor Bonaci : Google
> * Robert Bradshaw : Google
> * Ben Chambers : Google
> * Luke Cwik : Google
> * Stephan Ewen : dataArtisan
> * Dan Ha
On 12/04/2016 07:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>> Hi Roman,
>>
>> The affiliation for the proposed PMC members is:
>>
>> * Tyler Akidau : Google
>> * Davor Bonaci : Google
>> * Robert Bradshaw : Google
>> * Ben Chambers : Google
>>
Hi Roman,
Stephan (Ewen) is also ASF member.
Regards
JB
On 12/04/2016 07:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Roman,
The affiliation for the proposed PMC members is:
* Tyler Akidau : Google
* Davor Bonaci : Google
* Robert Bradshaw :
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>
> Thanks -- that's very helpful information.
>
> One last question -- at a quick glance you're the only ASF member on
> the PMC, correct?
I’m also following Beam closely (and have submitted several pull requests
working toward becomin
My gut says graduate, however I have one comment below.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM Frances Perry wrote:
> >
> > > * PMC composition:
> > > * Tyler Akidau , Google
> > > * Davor Bonaci , Google
> > > * Robert Bradshaw , Google
> > > * Ben Chambers , Go
Hi John,
Not sure I fully understand you. What do you mean ?
The proposed PMC members are already PPMC on the podling.
Regards
JB
On 12/04/2016 02:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
My gut says graduate, however I have one comment below.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM Frances Perry wrote:
Hi JB
It seems like podlings aren't tracking PPMC vs committers right now, at
least not consistently. I did find one podling who does have it listed -
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/metron.html
Is the list of the "committers" as per
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beam.html equivalent
In addition, since its not called out on your project page, which of these
> are current PPMC members and which are just committers? Everyone is listed
> as committer on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beam.html .
You can find the PPMC/committer distinction on the Beam site:
http://beam.inc
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM Frances Perry
wrote:
> In addition, since its not called out on your project page, which of these
> > are current PPMC members and which are just committers? Everyone is
> listed
> > as committer on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beam.html .
>
>
> You can fi
>
> I hate to be a PITA about it, but can you merge
> http://beam.incubator.apache.org/contribute/team/ into
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beam.html?
>
Done.
Out of personal technical interests, I've been following the podling quite
close.
They have made en enormous effort, both on the technical and community
sides.
I strongly believe the project is ready for graduation.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Apache Beam
Since it seems we have a consensus, I'm going to start a formal vote.
Please keep the discussion going, and vote only after you feel ready.
(Regardless of the outcome, we’d love to hear specific feedback on what can
be improved going forward.)
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Sergio Fernández wr
Since the discussion seems to have concluded and the formal vote has passed
unanimously [1], I'll submit the draft resolution to the Board for their
consideration (per graduation guide [2]).
Thanks everyone!
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71a1c63837a7d1506a10af9c70af1c24db988451ac5b53fa
Cool! Great work, guys!
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
> Since the discussion seems to have concluded and the formal vote has passed
> unanimously [1], I'll submit the draft resolution to the Board for their
> consideration (per graduation guide [2]).
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
Davor, congrants on the votes passing.
It is customary to conclude the vote (especially a more official one like this)
with a summary email with a subject:
[RESULT][VOTE]...
giving the tally of everyone who voted. Please consider doing that.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Dav
(Not to leave the thread hanging -- all this has been done previously.)
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> Davor, congrants on the votes passing.
>
> It is customary to conclude the vote (especially a more official one like
> this)
> with a summary email with a subject:
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
