Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-11-04 Thread Vinayak Borkar
Hi Marvin, It has now been close to a month since my email to which you replied. We were short by one vote then and we are short by one vote today. In the meantime there were issues raised regarding the distribution of ODC-BY content which was discussed on LEGAL-182 as you know and appears

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-10-18 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 17 October 2013 06:46, Vinayak Borkar vinay...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Marvin, Thanks for your email. I was unaware that votes are allowed to take a long time. My understanding (albeit flawed, I guess) was that votes are allowed to be outstanding for only 72 hours. Hence my email. My

[DISCUSS] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-10-16 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Hi Vinayak, On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Vinayak Borkar vinay...@gmail.com wrote: It has been over 72 hours since the vote for the first VXQuery release has been open, and we still do not have the one vote we need from an IPMC member. I am unsure how this process works. For the last four

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-10-16 Thread Vinayak Borkar
Hi Marvin, Thanks for your email. I was unaware that votes are allowed to take a long time. My understanding (albeit flawed, I guess) was that votes are allowed to be outstanding for only 72 hours. Hence my email. I do agree that retirement is a valid part of a software system's lifecycle.