I was just finally shuffling packages into the app-backup category
(originally discussed in March, but not implementing due to epkgmove
status at the time), and I wanted to put the herd into the category
metadata, but I found that we don't allow it presently.
Could the metadata.dtd please be
Ok, so it took me a bit longer than planned to create this, but now
thanks to epkgmove, I have got the new category together. If there is
other stuff that has been added to the tree since this list was put
together, please drop me a note on it, and i'll move it.
There is also a request for new
On Saturday 02 July 2005 22:54, Caleb Tennis wrote:
While your proposal works okay for the qt4 scenario, I'm more concerned
with the existing qt3 at the moment. As is, I stil l don't see a way
around what has been proposed for those ebuilds. Until portage has the
ability to handle deps, I
Hi,
why is the exactly same file installed twice ?
/var/db/pkg/dev-php/mod_php-4.3.11/CONTENTS :
..
dir /usr/lib
dir /usr/lib/php
dir /usr/lib/apache
obj /usr/lib/apache/libphp4.so 788d1b4d2166ab82fee1dfb5c96b175e 1120486898
dir /usr/lib/apache-extramodules
obj
I yet wat to remove all the app-doc/ebook-* ebuilds so made a script to
manage all the ebooks in lidn.
To install just emerge ebookmerge
*example of use :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ebookmerge.sh -s python
* Results for python :
python-2.2.1.tgz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ebookmerge.sh -e python-2.2.1.tgz
On Monday 04 July 2005 06:41 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:59:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
umm, that is until someone thinks it's a good idea to delete old stuff
case in point, wtf is app-games in gentoo-x86 ? we split all the games
packages into games-*
I applaud all those people on the Planet who are posting
anti-software-patent banners in their blogs. It's good to see yet
another major software project taking a stance.
Are these people prepared to back up their views by removing from the
tree all those ebuilds for software made by companies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't really see removing software from the tree because it's made by
a company that uses software patents as a choice that improves the user
experience with Gentoo. It doesn't make Gentoo more useful for anyone.
Just as software thats not open
If someone removes something that belongs to me, software patents or not, I'll
be asking for removal of (at the very least) their cvs access. If not, I'll be
asking for their total removal from the project. You can have all the views you
want on the world. I do. This is a technical project, not
On Monday, July 04, 2005 9:15 pm, Brian Jackson wrote:
If someone removes something that belongs to me, software patents or not,
I'll be asking for removal of (at the very least) their cvs access.
I believe that the original poster's intent was to post a request for
comments, although it was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are you personally prepared to practice what you preach? You had better
start by uninstalling the linux kernel...
twofourtysix wrote:
On 05/07/05, Anthony Gorecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, July 04, 2005 9:15 pm, Brian Jackson wrote:
If
On Monday, July 04, 2005 10:14 pm, Stuart Longland wrote:
Why stop there? Why not extend it to hardware manufacturers that make
heavy use of patents?
Good luck finding a decent video card for that lovely desktop of yours. :-)
I'm still holding out hope that the open sourced video card
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I personally am not going around encouraging people to take a stance
upon an issue whilst simultaneously helping out the very people
against whom one is supposed to be standing.
You have encouraged gentoo to remove patent-encoumbered software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
not being privvy to -core ( where I hear this was started and
subsequently moved to -dev ) I can only assume you didn't find what you
wanted on -core and are trolling for a decent response here.
I am certain there are people who agree with you on a
14 matches
Mail list logo
