On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some
eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle.
must have been a prefix-only bug as the version in the tree never did
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On 10-05-2008 03:32:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some
eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle.
must have been a prefix-only bug as the version in the tree never did
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Code may look like this:
# get last one of sorted list
for t in $(ls -1 /usr/bin/gcc-3*|sort); do
use teh globs, luke ;)
for t in /usr/bin/gcc-3*; do # will already do this, sorting according to
LC_COLLATE order (set to C or POSIX [same thing] for ebuild.) There's
Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added:moreutils-0.29.ebuild ChangeLog Manifest
Log:
initial ebuild for the moreutils package
src_unpack() {
unpack ${A}
cd ${WORKDIR}/moreutils
epatch ${FILESDIR}/docbook-makefile.patch
}
Zac Medico wrote:
It's currently possible for ebuilds to call the insopts, diropts,
exeopts, and libopts functions to modify these variables. If they
add the -p option, then timestamps will be preserved. I suppose we
can add -p to the default options if that's what everybody wants.
Gets my
On Samstag, 10. Mai 2008, Steve Long wrote:
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Code may look like this:
# get last one of sorted list
for t in $(ls -1 /usr/bin/gcc-3*|sort); do
use teh globs, luke ;)
for t in /usr/bin/gcc-3*; do # will already do this, sorting according to
LC_COLLATE order
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 10-05-2008 03:32:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote:
m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some
eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle.
must have been a
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 08 May 2008 16:33:28 -0700:
Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The complete log will
show up at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ shortly.
FWIW, the log entry at the URL above is still
# Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 May 2008)
# xemacs-packages-sumo cannot be installed together with any of the
separate
# xemacs packages. Please use xemacs-packages-all instead to install all
# xemacs packages. See bug 23949.
app-xemacs/xemacs-packages-sumo
I'm quite happy to close a bug
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:50:24AM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added:moreutils-0.29.ebuild ChangeLog Manifest
Log:
initial ebuild for the moreutils package
src_unpack() {
unpack ${A}
cd
10 matches
Mail list logo
