Josh Saddler wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>>> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing
>>> problems ..
>>>
>>> The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status,
>>> only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed.
>>>
>>> -stefan
>
On Monday 04 September 2006 04:32, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing
> problems ..
of course they are defined by their status ... you cant go handing out
bugzilla access to joe blow because he "contributed something"
> The status is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing
> problems ..
>
> The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status,
> only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed.
>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2006 02:45, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> Josh Saddler wrote:
>> > Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> > [. . .]
>> >
>> > Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does
>> > one *become* a "contributor" to get these rights?
>> >
>> > This
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> Josh Saddler wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>>> [. . .]
>>>
>>> Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does
>>> one *become* a "contributor" to get these righ
