Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: killing USE=userlocales

2006-04-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:07, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 22 April 2006 17:37, Tuan Van wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > this is because your /etc/locales.gen isnt configured thus the default > > > is to generate *all* locales > > > > can you magically migrate the existing /etc/local

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: killing USE=userlocales

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 22 April 2006 17:37, Tuan Van wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > this is because your /etc/locales.gen isnt configured thus the default is > > to generate *all* locales > > can you magically migrate the existing /etc/locales.build to > /etc/locales.gen? i guess that would be trivial/lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: killing USE=userlocales

2006-04-22 Thread Tuan Van
Mike Frysinger wrote: > this is because your /etc/locales.gen isnt configured thus the default is to > generate *all* locales > can you magically migrate the existing /etc/locales.build to /etc/locales.gen? regards, Tuan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: killing USE=userlocales

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:18, R Hill wrote: > one, does this make the compile time explode? IIRC that was one of the > original reasons userlocales was introduced. no, the compile times are the same with locale-gen as with USE=userlocales ... it's simply a different way of doing it > S

[gentoo-dev] Re: killing USE=userlocales

2006-04-22 Thread R Hill
Mike Frysinger wrote: for you peeps who want to give this a shot, sync up and try glibc-2.4-r2. hopefully i wont have [m]any more changes to make before i release it into ~arch. pretty cool. couple dumb questions though. one, does this make the compile time explode? IIRC that was one of th