Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
InSVN, and in the
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Brian,
> >>
> >>I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >InSVN, and in the tree...
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
InSVN, and in the tree... :)
Great! Thanks :)
I was just wondering: Will I be mentioned anywhere?
- Johannes.
--
gentoo-porta
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
InSVN, and in the tree... :)
~harring
pgpcmhNYyu2R8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Brian,
I just want to make sure this is still on your agenda :)
- Johannes.
Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
did you have a chance to look at this yet?
Will be integrating the changes sometime this week (spaced it tbh)
Great! Thank you :) I'll be watching the GWN closely :)
- Johannes.
Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian,
did you have a chance to look at this yet?
Will be integrating the changes sometime this week (spaced it tbh) :)
~har
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Brian,
>
> did you have a chance to look at this yet?
Will be integrating the changes sometime this week (spaced it tbh) :)
~harring
pgp3p83VZAsPc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Brian,
did you have a chance to look at this yet?
- Johannes.
Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
if [[ -n $PORTAGE_NICENESS ]] && ! [[ -z $WE_ARE_NICED ]]; then
Haven't looked at the patch yet, but a
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
if [[ -n $PORTAGE_NICENESS ]] && ! [[ -z $WE_ARE_NICED ]]; then
Haven't looked at the patch yet, but a bit of bash fu for ya-
[[ -n $VAR ]] == ! [[ -z $VAR ]]
-z is zero length or unset, -n is
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> if [[ -n $PORTAGE_NICENESS ]] && ! [[ -z $WE_ARE_NICED ]]; then
Haven't looked at the patch yet, but a bit of bash fu for ya-
[[ -n $VAR ]] == ! [[ -z $VAR ]]
-z is zero length or unset, -n is length >= 1 (thus must be set).
Brian Harring wrote:
Looks good; game to do the same for emerge-webrsync, and add in
support for tarsync if it's available?
Done. Please look at the patches, I hope this is what you had in mind.
I basically copied it from emerge-delta-webrsync.
Users will feed you cookies for the faster em
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Ok, here's the patch for emerge-delta-webrync to use PORTAGE_NICENESS.
> Brian, I hope this is what you had in mind.
> I didn't alter the emerge-webrsync patch again, I think it's OK the way
> I altered it in the last patch I p
Ok, here's the patch for emerge-delta-webrync to use PORTAGE_NICENESS.
Brian, I hope this is what you had in mind.
I didn't alter the emerge-webrsync patch again, I think it's OK the way
I altered it in the last patch I posted,
but I attached it again anyway.
- Johannes.
--- /usr/bin/emerge-del
Brian Harring wrote:
Are you suggesting that I should rather leave this up to you since you
were planning
on changing these things anyway?
Nah, I'm suggesting you do it since I don't have the time right now :)
Brian,
OK, I'll take care of it. I also won't have time until next week.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:51:03PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
>
>
> >I'd also raid the tarsync call- this is something I was intending on
> >doing but have't yet.
> >
>
>
> I don't have a very deep knowledge of all the portage internals.
> Are you suggesting
Brian Harring wrote:
I'd also raid the tarsync call- this is something I was intending on
doing but have't yet.
I don't have a very deep knowledge of all the portage internals.
Are you suggesting that I should rather leave this up to you since you
were planning
on changing these things
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 17:38 +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Good point. Is this patch better? Or should it rather be _exactly_ as it
> is in revdep-rebuild?
I personally would do it the same way as revdep-rebuild since that
causes the entire script and anything it calls to be run at the value
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:38:02PM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> Paul Varner wrote:
>
> >
> >Instead of hardcoding the nice value, use PORTAGE_NICENESS. Here is how
> >it is done in revdep-rebuild
> >
> ># Obey PORTAGE_NICENESS
> >PORTAGE_NICENESS=$(portageq envvar PORTAGE_NICENESS)
> >[ !
Paul Varner wrote:
Instead of hardcoding the nice value, use PORTAGE_NICENESS. Here is how
it is done in revdep-rebuild
# Obey PORTAGE_NICENESS
PORTAGE_NICENESS=$(portageq envvar PORTAGE_NICENESS)
[ ! -z "$PORTAGE_NICENESS" ] && renice $PORTAGE_NICENESS $$ > /dev/null
Good point. Is this
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:04 +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
> I put a "nice -n 19" in front of the tar, rsync and emerge metadata
> commands because normally calling emerge-webrsync renders my box
> unusable for 15 to 20 minutes. You still notice a difference when using
> "nice" but everything
Hi,
I'm new to this list put I have been using Gentoo for several years.
Thank you for all the hard work you put into this beautiful distribution.
Since I'm behind a quite restrictive proxy at work, I have to frequently
use emerge-webrsync.
I looked at the script today and thought that 2 things
21 matches
Mail list logo
