Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-12 Thread Mick
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > . . . but you responded to a plain text message from the list, which as I > > recall you could always do. The problem I believe is when you start a > > new message. Email me off list with a new message and I will confirm if > > it is als

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-12 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > >> >> Thanks. I didn't know you could change that in the address book. Can >> you tell me how this one comes through? It should be plain text, >> hopefully only plain text. >> >> Neat trick. ;-) >> > > OK, this is plain text as I

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-12 Thread Mick
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Hmm, he may be waiting for you to do it, while you're explaining to all > > these moms out there why you may think that top-posting in this ML would > > be considered good netiquette? BTW, I'm not condoning thread hi-jacking > > either . .

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:33:24 -0600, Dale wrote: > Thanks. I didn't know you could change that in the address book. Can > you tell me how this one comes through? It should be plain text, > hopefully only plain text. It is :) -- Neil Bothwick Trekkers work out in the `He's Dead Gym'. signa

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-12 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: > > Hmm, he may be waiting for you to do it, while you're explaining to all these > moms out there why you may think that top-posting in this ML would be > considered good netiquette? BTW, I'm not condoning thread hi-jacking > either . . . > > To Dale: have you tried setting up new

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-12 Thread Mick
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Hal Martin wrote: > I'll keep that in mind when I am sending email to the list from > Thunderbird. I'm also aware that many corporations block HTML mail to > lower the risk of a staff member opening up an infected/laced email > (generally on a Windows computer) so text

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-11 Thread Qian Qiao
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hal Martin wrote: > I'll keep that in mind when I am sending email to the list from > Thunderbird. I'm also aware that many corporations block HTML mail to > lower the risk of a staff member opening up an infected/laced email > (generally on a Windows

Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?)

2008-01-11 Thread Hal Martin
I'll keep that in mind when I am sending email to the list from Thunderbird. I'm also aware that many corporations block HTML mail to lower the risk of a staff member opening up an infected/laced email (generally on a Windows computer) so text emails are more advantageous in that regard. Randy, wh