Alan McKinnon writes:
> On 18/12/2014 04:45, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Is there any advantage one way or the other emerging firefox.bin vs firefox?
>
> Depends on your needs:
>
> firefox:
> - pro: you get all the USE flags
> - pro: you don't get bundled libs from Mozilla, the ebuild can use
> system
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:59:59 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 18/12/2014 04:45, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Is there any advantage one way or the other emerging firefox.bin vs
> > firefox?
>
> Depends on your needs:
>
> firefox:
> - pro: you get all the USE flags
> - pro: you don't get bundled lib
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 03:59:58 -0500
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> That is interesting, but firefox requires 8g I think of temp space,
> the very package which takes so long. I have 16g of memory, but I
> wonder if my whole system would start to crawl.
I would try it. I have only 8GiB. I used t
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:46:45AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Alan McKinnon writes:
>
> > On 18/12/2014 04:45, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >> Is there any advantage one way or the other emerging firefox.bin vs
> >> firefox?
> >
> > Depends on your needs:
> > […]
> > firefox-bin:
> > […]
> > - con: p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/12/14 06:10, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> I once -- just for fun -- compiled Firefox on an Atom N450. This
> has no effect on the loading time of 20 seconds. ^^
And how long did it take?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAE
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:07:34PM +0300, the wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 18/12/14 06:10, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > I once -- just for fun -- compiled Firefox on an Atom N450. This
> > has no effect on the loading time of 20 seconds. ^^
>
> And how long d
6 matches
Mail list logo
