On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:32:38 +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> The autounmask output looked like there was only that one option so I
> was puzzled. It would have been better if it had printed both options
> (player and/or utils) in this case.
It seems that autounmask suggests the first option tha
Am 28.06.2011 16:01, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> As usual, the answer comes from reading the ebuild. You must have at
> least one of player or utils in USE. -player works fine, as long as you
> don't also have -utils.
Thanks all of you, that really helped.
The autounmask output looked like there wa
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> atm I play with some use-flags and found that amarok has the flag player
> that can not be disabled.
>
> #required by amarok (argument)
> =media-sound/amarok-2.4.1 player
>
> If this flag is required at all costs, why make a fla
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:52:22 +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> atm I play with some use-flags and found that amarok has the flag player
> that can not be disabled.
>
> #required by amarok (argument)
> =media-sound/amarok-2.4.1 player
>
> If this flag is required at all costs, why make a flag at a
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 14:52:22 Sebastian Beßler did opine thusly:
> Hello,
>
> atm I play with some use-flags and found that amarok has the flag
> player that can not be disabled.
>
> #required by amarok (argument)
> =media-sound/amarok-2.4.1 player
>
> If this flag is required at all costs, w
Hello,
atm I play with some use-flags and found that amarok has the flag player
that can not be disabled.
#required by amarok (argument)
=media-sound/amarok-2.4.1 player
If this flag is required at all costs, why make a flag at all? What good
is a switch that can not be toggled?
Greetings
Seba
6 matches
Mail list logo
