Re: [gentoo-user] kdelibs : solved ! blame confcache !

2006-07-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:51:07 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > Is confcache considered stable ? Should I file a bug about this ? confcache is package.masked, you definitely should not file a bug about it. $ grep -B 2 confcache /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask # Diego Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2

Re: [gentoo-user] kdelibs : solved ! blame confcache !

2006-07-03 Thread Rumen Yotov
Hi, Philip Webb wrote: > 060703 Philip Webb wrote: >> (2) I recently added "confcache" to FEATURES : might that affect things ? > > I removed "confcache" from FEATURES & KDE 3.5.2-r6 emerged successfully ! > I'll try 3.5.3 later after some sleep. > > Is confcache considered stable ? Should I fil

[gentoo-user] kdelibs : solved ! blame confcache !

2006-07-03 Thread Philip Webb
060703 Philip Webb wrote: > (2) I recently added "confcache" to FEATURES : might that affect things ? I removed "confcache" from FEATURES & KDE 3.5.2-r6 emerged successfully ! I'll try 3.5.3 later after some sleep. Is confcache considered stable ? Should I file a bug about this ? > (3) I still