__
Lähettäjä: Brad Hards
Lähetetty: 18. elokuuta 2017 1:14
Vastaanottaja: 'Jody Garnett'
Kopio: 'Geoserver-devel'; 'Andrea Aime'
Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] Crazy idea... what about GeoPackage straight in
core for 2.12?
> I like the idea of making
> I like the idea of making geopackage core - because it is a good idea.
+1
> Brad when someone does have a chance to work on 1.2 is implemented it can
> start off life as a community module, and move into core when ready. We
> would need to support both versions right?
We would, but it probably w
Hey Brad / Andrea:
I like the idea of making geopackage core - because it is a good idea.
Brad when someone does have a chance to work on 1.2 is implemented it can
start off life as a community module, and move into core when ready. We
would need to support both versions right?
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Brad Hards wrote:
> I worry about the stability of the format. GeoPackage 1.2 isn't actually
> approved yet, and the changes from 1.1 are substantive (not just a patch):
> https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=74224&version=1 for
> the
> release no
> Hi,
> I was thinking about the current idea of splitting the geopackage
> support into several
> modules, one store, one WFS output (extension), one WPS output
> (extension), one WMS output
> (community, as written its dangerous for the server stability).
>
> Well, g
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> Makes sense to me. Can we get it done before the freeze?
>
Well, the nice thing is that we really just need to add a dependency to the
store in core
to have a basic setup going.
And maybe a custom panel (reusing the shapefile one) to
Makes sense to me. Can we get it done before the freeze?
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 27/07/17 05:08, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking about the current idea of splitting the geopackage support
into several
modules, one store, one WFS output (extension), one WPS output (extension),
one WMS output
I like the simplification; let's do it.
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 July 2017 at 10:08, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I was thinking about the current idea of splitting the geopackage support
> into several
> modules, one store, one WFS output (extension), one WPS output
> (extension), one WMS output
>
I saw an interesting talk at foss4ge on a proposed extension to geopackage
to store sld and ows context in the package as a separate table. This would
allow an easy way to migrate a set of styled data from Qgis to geoserver
directly.
If we were to implement this having geopackage in core would mak
Hi,
I was thinking about the current idea of splitting the geopackage support
into several
modules, one store, one WFS output (extension), one WPS output (extension),
one WMS output
(community, as written its dangerous for the server stability).
Well, given the importance of the format... what abo
10 matches
Mail list logo