Hi Sven,
> > So, yes, I state, publicly, again: this bug has been ignored for
> > months (in fact, for years, since Fedora 4, and we are now in
> > Fedora 7). No matter if you let me 'get away' or not.
>
> These bug reports have not been ignored. They are not GIMP bugs and
> have been reassigned a
Hi Mukund,
> > Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version >= 2.3.18)
> > needs "libexif >= 0.6.15", while there is no RPM repository
> > with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
> > based distros have the libexif outdated).
>
> Ah good. So there lies your problem :-)
Ye
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:34:28 +0200, Geert Jordaens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Gowers wrote:
>> On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>
I think "nearest neighbour" is non technical, ver
David Gowers wrote:
On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think "nearest neighbour" is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
and readily understood.
IMO it is very technical and the vast majo
On 6/23/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think "nearest neighbour" is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
> > and readily understood.
>
> IMO it is very technical and the vast majority of users does not
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think "nearest neighbour" is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
> and readily understood.
IMO it is very technical and the vast majority of users does not
understand its meaning. They also don't understand Linear or C
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:57:23 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Note the conditional "should" and the uncertainty "probably". I'm not
>> being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest
>> p
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Note the conditional "should" and the uncertainty "probably". I'm not
> being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest
> proposing a re-examination and also proposing an alternative that I
> consider be
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:36 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> But I sent this email, with subject "still the same bug" on April 30
> to this list (Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 56, Issue 1, to be precise):
>
> : However, about a year or two ago, I reported a bug in Bugzilla:
> : the mouse buttons
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:36:01 +0200, Luis A. Florit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Look at this for example:
>>
>> > So:
>> >
>> > 1) Is the EXIF source in the all the 3 cameras (of 3 different
>> > brands) broken?
>> > 2) Why all the other graphic programs that I use (showfoto,
>> > gqview, gthum
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:53:16 +0200,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is overly presumptuous, in my opinion, to declare that labeling
> nearest neighbor interpolation as "None" is an error on the part of
> the user interface designers of the GIMP. It may be worthwhile to
> propose re-examination o
11 matches
Mail list logo
