[Gimp-developer] Stroking path with brush dynamics

2010-11-09 Thread Ofnuts
While playing with 2.7, I noticed that one of the brush dynamics is the oriention, something I had been longing for. However, when stroking a selection, the results are a bit disappointing. Here is an XCF with a couple of tests: http://dl.free.fr/fRALiPMXa (on the left, the 2.7 results, on th

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.7: selection to path procedure lookup failed.

2010-11-09 Thread Ofnuts
Worked a treat. Now both versions seem to coexist peacefully. Thanks. On 11/09/2010 08:24 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote: > Well, the default prefix is for when you want to override an > installation in /usr, if you don't want that, which is the case here, it > is your responsibility to change it to

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.7: selection to path procedure lookup failed.

2010-11-09 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 11/09/2010 09:09 AM, Ofnuts wrote: > On 11/09/2010 07:17 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: >> * Don't install into a prefix in a prefix, rather use /usr and /opt > > Ain't me... I used all defaults in the Git build scripts. Well, the default prefix is for when you want to override an installatio

[Gimp-developer] Re : Hello from an Inkscape filters developer !

2010-11-09 Thread Ivan Louette
Wow ! That's very nice. That would be also very smart if the GEGL staff could provide some GEGL Filters Editor in the future ! ivan De : Alexandre Prokoudine À : gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Envoyé le : Lun 8 novembre 2010, 0h 21min 06s Objet : Re: [

[Gimp-developer] [PATCH] Fix for memory and file descriptor leaks

2010-11-09 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! Can somebody review two patches that (hopefully) fix some memory and file descriptor leaks, please? The first one is basically g_free()s and fclose()s: http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/gimp/patches/0001-Fix-memory-and-descriptor-leaks.patch For the second one, instead including a fclose

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.7: selection to path procedure lookup failed.

2010-11-09 Thread Ofnuts
On 11/09/2010 07:17 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote: > On 11/08/2010 11:22 PM, Ofnuts wrote: >> I'm trying to have coexisting a locally built 2.7 and a packaged 2.6.8. >> >> 2.6.8 goes to /usr/bin and /usr/lib and 2.7 installs into /usr/local/lib >> and /usr/local/bin >> >> I start 2.7 via a shell that