On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
__asm__ __volatile__ ()
while the new code in The GIMP seems to be using
asm()
I don't know this stuff good enough to know the difference, but I'd
__keyword__-style keywords are always there, even if gcc
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:52:08AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
asm(movq %0, %%mm1
:
: m(rgba8_alpha_mask)
: %mm1);
breaks on the second %mm1;
I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers. What's
worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc know about
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:13:29PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers.
yupp, there is no %mm1 register :)
worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc know about MMX registers at
versions 2.x (usually)
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:52:08AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
I don't think there should be a % in the list of clobbered registers. What's
worse, I don't even think most versions of gcc know about MMX registers at
all (I might be mistaken,
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That said, some day soon, the GIMP developers are going to have
to get together for a brainstorning session about how we can
communicate better with the user base, and vice versa. With IRC,
Bugzilla, 2 mailing lists, usenet, the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The new code is missing a #ifdef somewhere, I think - perhaps
composite-mmx.c shouldn't be build at all if USE_MMX isn't
defined... but that's another issue.
I've added an #ifdef that causes the file content to be skipped. I
prefer #ifdefs over
Hi David,
could you please test the attached diff to configure.in. It should
find the problem with your compiler and it even simplifies things a
bit.
Sven
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gimp/configure.in,v
retrieving
This isn't quite ready to go yet. But thanks for the note. The default
build behaviour right now is to not build the new code.
Helvetix
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 08:36:44AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
The new MMX composite code in the 1.3 tree doesn't build for me -
am I the only one?
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi David,
could you please test the attached diff to configure.in. It should
find the problem with your compiler and it even simplifies things a
bit.
I have stried, and my computer passes the mmx test with flying
colours :) It seems that the thing which is annoying my
