Is it possible to set up gimp such that typing 'gimp foo.xcf' on the
commandline will just open foo.xcf in a currently running Gimp
session? I've seen no documentation on this anyhere.
I know this is a feature, but I would find it tremendously useful to add
before 1.2... (or maybe in 1.2.1 or s
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> Is it possible to set up gimp such that typing 'gimp foo.xcf' on the
> commandline will just open foo.xcf in a currently running Gimp
> session? I've seen no documentation on this anyhere.
>
> I know this is a feature, but I would find it tremend
Alex Harford wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to set up gimp such that typing 'gimp foo.xcf' on the
> > commandline will just open foo.xcf in a currently running Gimp
> > session? I've seen no documentation on this anyhere.
> >
> > I know this is a fea
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:19:44AM +0200, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was thinking of a Gimp extension "gimp-server" or something which would
Actually, this is called "Perl-Server"
> The pipe protocol could be as trivial as sending a plaintext string like
I posted a oneline
Hi there,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:19:44AM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> > > Is it possible to set up gimp such that typing 'gimp foo.xcf' on the
> > > commandline will just open foo.xcf in a currently running Gimp
> > > session? I've seen no documentation on this anyhere.
> > It's been abl
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:19:44AM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
> The netscape method of communicating over the X protocol seems a bit
> overkill to me.
>
IMHO using X makes much more sense than abusing the filesystem.
Both ways of doing it (that were discussed so far) won't work on no
>IMHO using X makes much more sense than abusing the filesystem.
>
>Both ways of doing it (that were discussed so far) won't work on non-UNIX
>platforms anyway, so I guess we can safely rely on X for this feature.
The problem with using X is that the xterm where "gimp " is invoked
is not necessa
> I was thinking of a Gimp extension "gimp-server" or something which would
> open a Unix pipe
>
> ${gimp_dir}/tmp/gimp_remote.
>
> with the permissions of the current user (or configurable) and
> a "gimp-remote" standalone program.
>
> The pipe protocol could be as trivial as sending
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should really use a CORBA interface and register some sort of
> singleton factory object for images or other GIMP services.
>
> (Look at how singleton applications work in GNOME; the Midnight
> Commander or the Panel ar
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:44:58AM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> applications. Well, over the last year I discovered that it was not
> the case and that it was possible to install some GNOME libraries
It is _no longer_ the case, fortunately ;)
> would avoid the duplication
10 matches
Mail list logo
