On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2
> I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm.
> The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency
> problems
Yes, I have Gimp2.0pre on Mdk 9.2
Have you installed
Without thinking all that hard about the details of your problem, why
don't you just compile gimp from source? Then you'll find out what you
really need to compile/install.
Tip: use 'checkinstall' instead of 'make install'. It'll do a 'make
install' for you and make custom RPMs of anything your
Which freetype2 version do you have.
I tried to make a rpm with the following command, just in case I need to
uninstall it.
rpm -ta gimp-2.0pre1.tar.bz2
I get the following:
error: Failed build dependencies:
gimp-print-devel >= 4.2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1
librsvg2-devel >=
Hi,
Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a
> dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to
> get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems
Since freetype2 is used as the standard font rende
??
It compiled and installed flawlesly on my Mandrake 9.2 system.
I think freetype 2 came installed by default here.
Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them
configure, make, make install.
Regards,
JS
-><-
On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas S
Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2
I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm.
The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency
problems
Tom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know, but IMO this issue is a __totally blocker__ for 2.0
> final.
> Not only it would hurt the GIMP but the whole GNU/Linux and free
> software, if there came out a major distribution in which a
> previously "working" scanner wou
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 19:40, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> I don't know, but IMO this issue is a __totally blocker__ for 2.0
> final.
How can a 3rd-party plug-in be a blocker for The GIMP 2.0?
> Not only it would hurt the GIMP but the whole GNU/Linux and free
> software, if there came out a major
On Thursday 08 January 2004 23:34, Conrad Newton wrote:
> What is the state of scanner support for GIMP-1.3?
>
> I have been reading statements on the web that say
> that SANE works with GIMP-1.2 but not GIMP-1.3.
> Is this still the case, or has the situation changed?
>
> Thanks, Conrad
I don't
I've scanned an image.
Here it is:
http://epierce.freeshell.org/web_phile_mgr/images/guy.png
I want to lost the halftones (I think that's what it's called - ie., the
dots). I did a blur and sharpen, and that works OK. But I thought I saw
a tutorial on this once on a smarter way to "remove" thes
On Friday 09 January 2004 00:56, John McCain wrote:
> When I try to copy an image fragment including a jagged diagonal line into
> another image, Gimp seems to tend to wash the edges a little, creating a
> gradient between the colors of the two bordering sections about 3-4 pixels
> wide.
Frequentl
Thanks a lot, Michael and Owen!
Paulo
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Hi
Thanks for the advice. I did have /usr/local/lib in ld.so.conf. But I
typed ldconfig at the command line anyway. It seems to have worked,
and gimp2 opens ok.
Again thanks to all who helped.
David
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks for the a
Hi,
"John McCain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I try to copy an image fragment including a jagged diagonal line into
> another image, Gimp seems to tend to wash the edges a little, creating a
> gradient between the colors of the two bordering sections about 3-4 pixels
> wide. I don't want
14 matches
Mail list logo
