On Thu, 26 May 2005 18:59:49 -0400
McAfee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the latest versions of libjpeg, libpng, libtiff and libXpm
> installed with LD_LIBRARY_PATH set accordingly. I also downloaded and
> installed gimpprint, and gimp-help.
>
> After three compile attempts...
>
> 1) I s
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
between the two separately licensed, separately
Hi,
BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I'm not sure if the Gimp folks check all the plugins out before
> making them available or adding them, but it would seem logical to me
> for them to have control over that, so no harmful plugins would be
> submitted. Have a contributor send the
Hi,
Asif Lodhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about giving us a configurable option to configure any one or
> both of these facilities?
Making things configurable is a bad thing to do. Every new
configuration option that is being added doubles the amount of
possible configurations. This make
I have the latest versions of libjpeg, libpng, libtiff and libXpm
installed with LD_LIBRARY_PATH set accordingly. I also downloaded and
installed gimpprint, and gimp-help.
After three compile attempts...
1) I still cannot save in any other format other than .xcf
2) There is still no 'file/pri
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 02:14:44
> +0200
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] use of the Space key
>
>
> Because I tried it and I made the experience that it
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 02:14:44
> +0200
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] use of the Space key
>
>
> Because I tried it and I made the experience that it
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
> Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
> implemented identically).
>
> And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
> extensions : the update system.
This
Dude, you're right! Thanks! I forgot that I changed my local files in
the gimp dir and nowhere else. Well roared, maestro!
New package fixed and uploaded at
http://www.artcamilla.dk/vaultage/cornucopia/gimp-cgt-v0.1-20050526.tgz
-Rene Jensen
> I'm not sure I understand your answe
On Thursday 26 May 2005 03:36 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:23PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
> > I'll try to clarify Pierre's & Erika's points, if I'm reading them
> > correctly. You have obviously gone off in a different direction
> > than I think either of them were heading,
On Thursday 26 May 2005 04:07 pm, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > Have someone make a depositry of plugins
>
> http://registry.gimp.org
>
> It isn't as easy to use as the Mozilla plugin system but I wanted to
> make sure you were aware of it.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Alan Horkan
> http://advogato.org/person/AlanHo
> Have someone make a depositry of plugins
http://registry.gimp.org
It isn't as easy to use as the Mozilla plugin system but I wanted to make
sure you were aware of it.
Sincerely
Alan Horkan
http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
___
Gimp-user maili
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:03:34PM +0200, Rene Jensen wrote:
> Is there a way to share code between python-plugins? A file with common
> classes and functions would greatly reduce work-overhead for me.
>
> It would appear that the usual trick (i.e. from mycommonfile import *)
> doesn't work as the
Erika De Jesus wrote:
> yeah, i think that's gonna be great! though my prob is that
> i'm no developer. and that im sorry that i can't contribute
> plugins, brushes, patterns, and stuff. though i am pro to your
> decision. the only question is... who does all the updating
> and server paying? i don
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:23PM -0400, BandiPat wrote:
> I'll try to clarify Pierre's & Erika's points, if I'm reading them
> correctly. You have obviously gone off in a different direction than I
> think either of them were heading, but you also make some good points.
> Is that being diplo
Il giorno gio, 26-05-2005 alle 09:59 +0200, Rene Jensen ha scritto:
> Hi there! Thanks for trying out, and do keep the comments coming.
>
> > Hi, I installed your plugin but I wasn't able to select brushes. I
> > noticed that the names of brushes starts with OGM so I changed this line
> > in your
Is there a way to share code between python-plugins? A file with common
classes and functions would greatly reduce work-overhead for me.
It would appear that the usual trick (i.e. from mycommonfile import *)
doesn't work as the python interpreter is based at the user home dir
(i.e. calling os.getc
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >interesting.
> >
> >could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
> >similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
> >between the two separately licensed, separately funded
On Thursday 26 May 2005 01:16 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
> > Carol Spears wrote:
> > >could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
> > >similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
> > >between the t
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:50:31PM +0300, Erika De Jesus wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
> >similarities and i am interested to see what similarities you see
> >between the two separately licensed, separately funded softwares that do
>
Tom Williams writes:
> I'm in the same boat in that I didn't "discover" the current space bar
> behavior and now that I know about it, I think it's great. The reason I
> didn't discover it is purely because I never thought to press the space
> bar at all.
I don't even have that excuse. I pr
yeah, i think that's gonna be great! though my prob is that
i'm no developer. and that im sorry that i can't contribute
plugins, brushes, patterns, and stuff. though i am pro to your
decision. the only question is... who does all the updating
and server paying? i dont think we can make GIMP pay it
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
s
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
>
> I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
> Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
> implemented identically).
>
interesting.
could you expand on the comparison for me? i do not see any
similarities and i am i
Hi,
I believe Gimp & it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox & it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
extensions : the update system.
So I was thinking : why not have such update system
for the Gimp ? It would be reall
Hi there! Thanks for trying out, and do keep the comments coming.
> Hi, I installed your plugin but I wasn't able to select brushes. I
> noticed that the names of brushes starts with OGM so I changed this line
> in your plugins:
>
> self.config[self.name+'-brush' ], 'CGT.*' )
>
> into
>
> self
Hello,
Why not use another key (or key combination) for that
function ? Maybe it's not Photoshop's behavior, but
Gimp's not really just a Photoshop's clone...
Pierre-Alexis.
__
--- Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> Hi,
>
> Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sp
27 matches
Mail list logo
