On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:03:52PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > my question was about the logic which lead to this condition of this
> > gimp and its ability to install different versions, side by side.
> > like the good old days.
>
> I am s
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i was trying to restate the following quote from a previous email in
> this thread:
>
> "That's the reason that gimp-2.1 cannot be installed into the same
> prefix as gimp-2.0. It's supposed to replace it. Currently there's the
> temporary condition
well,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:29:49PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > my memory now is that there were so many things (plug-ins) that would
> > need name changes for the new previews and similar changes.
>
> Huh? I have no idea what you are refering
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my memory now is that there were so many things (plug-ins) that would
> need name changes for the new previews and similar changes.
Huh? I have no idea what you are refering to.
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailin
memory kicks in ...
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > this is not the case with gimp-2.1 and that nice list. can someone
> > remind me of the logic of this (i assume) temporary condition? the
> > developers i came to respe
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GIMP 1.2.x and 2.0.x will happily co-exist.
> >
> as will gimp-1.0 and gimp-1.1 and gimp-1.3 exist with gimp-1.2 and
> gimp-2.0, if you are like me and have little things from all of them
> that you want and a big enough hard drive and distributio
Actually,
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:41:55PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 18:03, Squareyes wrote:
>
> > 4. Do I need to remove any files relating to the version I am now using?
> > I have read on this list that the 2 versions will co-exist.
>
> GIMP 1.2.x and 2.0.x w
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 18:03, Squareyes wrote:
> 1. Am using Mandrake 9.1, and will use rpmdrake, will these Rpm's be
> suitable for it?
I think the RPMs provided by Xach is for Red Hat Linux 9 only.
> 2. If they are suitable, is there any particular order I should install
> them in?
If I
Hello,
Squareyes wrote:
I have been watching the list talking about Gimp 2. and would like to
try it.
Good luck :)
1. Am using Mandrake 9.1, and will use rpmdrake, will these Rpm's be
suitable for it?
I'm not sure.
2. If they are suitable, is there any particular order I should install
them in?
Hi all,
I have been watching this list since early March this year and have to
admit am getting more confused by the day.
I have been using The Gimp to edit my digital photo's (version 1.2.3
which I am very impressed with, very logical to use)
and have been watching the list talking about Gimp 2.
10 matches
Mail list logo
