On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com wrote:
- check_linked_checkout() when trying to decide what branch is
checked out assumes HEAD is always a regular file, but I do not
think we have dropped the support of SYMLINK_HEAD yet. It needs
to check
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
This series eliminates git-checkout from the picture by instead
employing git reset --hard[2] to populate the new worktree initially.
A few comments on things I noticed while
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Related to that, I'm interested in worktree list, and I'm wondering
how many more worktree commands we foresee, and therefore how much
refactoring should be done: Currently, the parsing of the contents of
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 13.07.2015 20:36:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
This is a follow-on series to [1], which migrated git checkout --to
functionality to git worktree add. That series continued using git
checkout for the initial population of the new worktree,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
This is a follow-on series to [1], which migrated git checkout --to
functionality to git worktree add. That series continued using git
checkout for the initial
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
This is a follow-on series to [1], which migrated git checkout --to
functionality to git worktree add. That series continued using git
checkout for the initial population of the new worktree, which required
git-checkout to have too intimate
This is a follow-on series to [1], which migrated git checkout --to
functionality to git worktree add. That series continued using git
checkout for the initial population of the new worktree, which required
git-checkout to have too intimate knowledge that it was operating in a
newly created
7 matches
Mail list logo