On 04/01/2014 09:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty writes:
>
>> This is consistent with the usual nomenclature.
>
> I am of two minds.
>
> Looking for "\(\.\|->\)ref_name" used to ignore refname fields of
> other structures and let us focus on the ref_update structure. Yes,
> the
Michael Haggerty writes:
> This is consistent with the usual nomenclature.
I am of two minds.
Looking for "\(\.\|->\)ref_name" used to ignore refname fields of
other structures and let us focus on the ref_update structure. Yes,
there is the ref_lock structure that shares ref_name to contaminat
This is consistent with the usual nomenclature.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty
---
refs.c | 18 +-
refs.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index dfff117..d72d0ab 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -3274,7 +3274,7 @@ stati
3 matches
Mail list logo