Re: [PATCH v2 22/27] struct ref_update: Rename field "ref_name" to "refname"

2014-04-01 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 04/01/2014 09:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty writes: > >> This is consistent with the usual nomenclature. > > I am of two minds. > > Looking for "\(\.\|->\)ref_name" used to ignore refname fields of > other structures and let us focus on the ref_update structure. Yes, > the

Re: [PATCH v2 22/27] struct ref_update: Rename field "ref_name" to "refname"

2014-04-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty writes: > This is consistent with the usual nomenclature. I am of two minds. Looking for "\(\.\|->\)ref_name" used to ignore refname fields of other structures and let us focus on the ref_update structure. Yes, there is the ref_lock structure that shares ref_name to contaminat

[PATCH v2 22/27] struct ref_update: Rename field "ref_name" to "refname"

2014-03-24 Thread Michael Haggerty
This is consistent with the usual nomenclature. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty --- refs.c | 18 +- refs.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c index dfff117..d72d0ab 100644 --- a/refs.c +++ b/refs.c @@ -3274,7 +3274,7 @@ stati