On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:01:05PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> > The v4 series leaves the remote branch amigious, but it helps you
> > point the local branch at the r
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:09:03AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> * A new 'submodule pull' for tracking the submodule's remote, which is
> pulling --ff-only origin/$branch into a whatever state the submodule
> is currently in. If any changes were made to submodule $shas,
> optionally commit
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:42:05PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:28:58AM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> > https://github.com/hvoigt/git/commits/hv/floating_submodules_draft
>
> I looked over this before, but maybe not thoroughly enough ;).
Heiko pointed out that I likely
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:28:58AM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:01:05PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> > The v4 series leaves the remote branch amigious, but it helps you
> > point the local branch at the rig
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:01:05PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> The v4 series leaves the remote branch amigious, but it helps you
> point the local branch at the right hash so that future calls to
>
> $ git submodule foreach '
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:00:15PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > From: "W. Trevor King"
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54:02PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > > We could add
> > >
> > > $ git submodule update --branch
> > >
Hi,
I just realized that I gave you an confusing suggestion.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> if test "$subsha1" != "$sha1"
> then
> handle_on_demand_fetch_update ...
> else
> handle_tracked_branch_update ...
> fi
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> I would prefer if we could squash all these commits together into
> one since it seems to me one logical step, using the new variable
> for update belongs together with its configuration on
> initialization.
Works for me. I could also
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:00:15PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> From: "W. Trevor King"
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54:02PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > We could add
> >
> > $ git submodule update --branch
> >
> > to checkout the gitlinked SHA1 as submodule..branch in each of
> > t
From: "W. Trevor King"
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54:02PM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
> We could add
>
> $ git submodule update --branch
>
> to checkout the gitlinked SHA1 as submodule..branch in each of
> the submodules, leaving the submodules on the .gitmodules-configured
> branch. Effectiv
10 matches
Mail list logo