#!/usr/bin/perl
Should we have hard-coded PATH to perl here ?
/usr/bin/perl --version
This is perl, v5.10.0 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
(with 2 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
+
+my $is_passing = Test::More-builder-is_passing;
+exit($is_passing ? 0 : 1);
This
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes:
#!/usr/bin/perl
Should we have hard-coded PATH to perl here ?
This is what is done in other tests:
$ head t*/test.pl -n 1
== t0202/test.pl ==
#!/usr/bin/perl
== t9000/test.pl ==
#!/usr/bin/perl
== t9700/test.pl ==
#!/usr/bin/perl
We actually
Remi Lespinet remi.lespi...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr writes:
I'd vote for keeping it simple and not having the copyright notice. Most
t/*.sh do not have one. The Git history + mailing-list archives are much
better than in-code comments to keep track of who wrote what.
Remi: any objection on
I'd vote for keeping it simple and not having the copyright notice. Most
t/*.sh do not have one. The Git history + mailing-list archives are much
better than in-code comments to keep track of who wrote what.
Remi: any objection on removing it?
Sorry for not having resent the patches myself,
From: Remi Lespinet remi.lespi...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr
parse_address_line had not the same behavior whether the user had
Mail::Address or not. Teach parse_address_line to behave like
Mail::Address.
When the user input is correct, this implementation behaves
exactly like Mail::Address except
Matthieu Moy matthieu@imag.fr writes:
diff --git a/t/t9000-addresses.sh b/t/t9000-addresses.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000..7223d03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t9000-addresses.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2015
That does not look like a valid copyright notice.
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Matthieu Moy matthieu@imag.fr writes:
diff --git a/t/t9000-addresses.sh b/t/t9000-addresses.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000..7223d03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t9000-addresses.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2015
That
7 matches
Mail list logo