v3 has the following changes:
- new leading patch by Junio to clean up t7508 (slightly modified by myself)
- adjust tests accordingly
- revert back to standard c/,i/ resp. i/,w/ diff prefixes with a header line
Open questionis for 3/3:
- Do we need the header to stick out even more? (I don't think
Michael J Gruber writes:
> v3 has the following changes:
> - new leading patch by Junio to clean up t7508 (slightly modified by myself)
> - adjust tests accordingly
> - revert back to standard c/,i/ resp. i/,w/ diff prefixes with a header line
>
> Open questionis for 3/3:
> - Do we need the heade
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Michael J Gruber writes:
>
>> - Do we want the header line also for "status -v"? (I would say yes, but that
>> would be a change to current behaviour.)
>
> I would not object to it very strongly, but I do not see a point in
> changing the behaviour.
>
> And I do not se
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Extending this line of thought further.
>
> If I am reading your patch 3/3 right, "status -v -v" shows the
> header when there are patches to be shown for the category. I am
> not sure if that is the most helpful way for the users, when either
> c/i xor i/w diffs is mis
4 matches
Mail list logo
