On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:48:22PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> >> Exact renames are the obvious one, but they are not handled here.
> >
> > That is half true. Before this change, we will find the same number
> > of needles and this function would have said "no diff
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> Exact renames are the obvious one, but they are not handled here.
>
> That is half true. Before this change, we will find the same number
> of needles and this function would have said "no differences" in a
> very inefficient way. After this change, we may apply differ
Jeff King writes:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:13:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > static int has_changes(struct diff_filepair *p, struct diff_options *o,
>> > regex_t *regexp, kwset_t kws)
>> > {
>> > + struct userdiff_driver *textconv_one = get_textconv(p->one);
>>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:13:19PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > static int has_changes(struct diff_filepair *p, struct diff_options *o,
> >regex_t *regexp, kwset_t kws)
> > {
> > + struct userdiff_driver *textconv_one = get_textconv(p->one);
> > + struct userdiff_driv
Jeff King writes:
> We currently just look at raw blob data when using "-S" to
> pickaxe. This is mostly historical, as pickaxe predates the
> textconv feature. If the user has bothered to define a
> textconv filter, it is more likely that their search string will be
> on the textconv output, as
We currently just look at raw blob data when using "-S" to
pickaxe. This is mostly historical, as pickaxe predates the
textconv feature. If the user has bothered to define a
textconv filter, it is more likely that their search string will be
on the textconv output, as that is what they will see in
6 matches
Mail list logo
