Re: Regression (?) in core.safecrlf=false messaging

2018-06-04 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 04.06.18 17:43, Anthony Sottile wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: >> >> Does the following patch fix your problem ? >> >> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c >> index 6f8f1d8c11..c625aec96a 100644 >> --- a/config.c >> +++ b/config.c >> @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ stat

Re: Regression (?) in core.safecrlf=false messaging

2018-06-04 Thread Anthony Sottile
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: > > Does the following patch fix your problem ? > > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c > index 6f8f1d8c11..c625aec96a 100644 > --- a/config.c > +++ b/config.c > @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char *var, > c

Re: Regression (?) in core.safecrlf=false messaging

2018-06-04 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
Does the following patch fix your problem ? diff --git a/config.c b/config.c index 6f8f1d8c11..c625aec96a 100644 --- a/config.c +++ b/config.c @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char *var, const char *value) } eol_rndtrp_die = git_conf

Re: Regression (?) in core.safecrlf=false messaging

2018-06-04 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
(as usual, no top-posting here, please see my answers at the end) On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 10:54:00PM -0700, Anthony Sottile wrote: > I'm a bit unclear if I was depending on undocumented behaviour or not > here but it seems the messaging has recently changed with respect to > `core.safecrlf` > > M

Regression (?) in core.safecrlf=false messaging

2018-06-03 Thread Anthony Sottile
I'm a bit unclear if I was depending on undocumented behaviour or not here but it seems the messaging has recently changed with respect to `core.safecrlf` My reading of the documentation https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#git-config-coresafecrlf (I might be wrong here) - core.safecrlf = true ->