Hi all.
I wrote the following test program:
bar x = x * x
on a Win32 (SP3) machine using the Haskell Platform and GHC-7.6.1
(standalone) and I have noticed the same frustrating errors. Any
suggestions would be most appreciated.
Thanks,
~Caitlin
C:\>ghci
GHCi, version 7.4.2: http://www.haskell
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Austin Seipp wrote:
There have been a few of these bugs recently it seems. If you could:
use the stage1 compiler to compile a simple executable, like 'main =
return ()' or hello world or whatever.
The stage1 compiler can be located in the build directory, under
'inplace/bin
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> If the intended meaning of -msse is
>
> Use SSE instructions in Haskell compilations
>
> then of course we should pass -mattr=+sse to LLVM, because it is the backend
> for Haskell compilations. But we should not pass it to gcc, unless we'r
On 17/01/13 20:06, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
I forgot I once raised this on the GHC bug tracker:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7025
Here's what Simon M had to say back then:
"The right thing is to put -msse in the cc-options field o
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> I forgot I once raised this on the GHC bug tracker:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7025
>
> Here's what Simon M had to say back then:
>
> "The right thing is to put -msse in the cc-options field of your
> .cabal file, if that's
Hi all,
I forgot I once raised this on the GHC bug tracker:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7025
Here's what Simon M had to say back then:
"The right thing is to put -msse in the cc-options field of your
.cabal file, if that's what you want.
I'm distinctly uneasy about having -msse m
There have been a few of these bugs recently it seems. If you could:
use the stage1 compiler to compile a simple executable, like 'main =
return ()' or hello world or whatever.
The stage1 compiler can be located in the build directory, under
'inplace/bin/ghc-stage1'. So something like:
/inplace/b
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Karel Gardas wrote:
On 01/16/13 08:12 PM, rocon...@theorem.ca wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Karel Gardas wrote:
Good! So the patch I already provided is working fine at least w.r.t.
change in configure. I've tested it here on my raspbian chroot on
pandaboard where I've hac
Hi,
I am experimenting with rewrite rules, but found that they do not fire
as often as I wanted them. Here is a small example:
module MapId where
myMap f [] = []
myMap f (x:xs) = f x : myMap f xs
{-# RULES "map id" myMap id = id #-}
{-# RU
