Re[4]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-30 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 8:00:56 PM, you wrote: java/c# libs can't be used with current ghc, so 99% of Making it possible to use Haskell in mixed language projects with C++ and Java how ghc/mingw can be used with java? :) -- Best regards, Bulat

Re: Re[4]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-30 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 10:05 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Duncan, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 8:00:56 PM, you wrote: java/c# libs can't be used with current ghc, so 99% of Making it possible to use Haskell in mixed language projects with C++ and Java how ghc/mingw can be used

Re[6]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-30 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Monday, April 30, 2007, 10:11:09 AM, you wrote: how ghc/mingw can be used with java? :) I expect it's quite tricky! :-) I'm not claiming it works or is easy, I was just commenting that making so, you agree that 99% of foreign-language libs that can be used with ghc/mingw are

Re: Re[6]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-30 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 11:02 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Duncan, Monday, April 30, 2007, 10:11:09 AM, you wrote: how ghc/mingw can be used with java? :) I expect it's quite tricky! :-) I'm not claiming it works or is easy, I was just commenting that making so, you agree

RE: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-30 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| Making it possible to use Haskell in mixed language projects with C++ | and Java is obviously a good thing, but it's not really a scalable | solution to distribute them all together. We should look at how to | improve cabal+ghc to make it easier to use them as a component of a | larger system.

Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-29 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Albert, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote: Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a C++ compiler? .NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET. Can we also include a .NET runtime, a .NET documentation suite, all .NET

Re: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 10:38 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Albert, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote: Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a C++ compiler? .NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET. Can

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:07 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Ian, Thursday, April 26, 2007, 3:22:23 PM, you wrote: The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.6.1 can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done before and as it requested by trac

Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Saturday, April 28, 2007, 9:58:18 PM, you wrote: can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done before and as it requested by trac ticket http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1024 ? Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC

Re: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Neil Mitchell
Hi Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a alternative way may be inclusion of instructions how to add c++ compiler to ghc installation - it's not trivial because one need to know which gcc version should be used and which files copied Since I know that Bulat

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-28 Thread Albert Y. C. Lai
Duncan Coutts wrote: Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a C++ compiler? I'm afraid it's just you. Like that someone who has indicated interest in haskell-c++ integration, I am interested in the prospect of mixing haskell with .NET languages, and not to

ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-26 Thread Ian Lynagh
= The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.6.1 = The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC. This release contains a

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-26 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Ian, Thursday, April 26, 2007, 3:22:23 PM, you wrote: The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.6.1 can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done before and as it requested by trac ticket http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1024 ? to be

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-26 Thread shelarcy
Hello, Bulat, On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:07:47 +0900, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done before and as it requested by trac ticket http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1024 ? This problem is already fixed.

Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-26 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello shelarcy, Thursday, April 26, 2007, 6:54:40 PM, you wrote: Hello, Bulat, On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:07:47 +0900, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you please include in win32 distro c++ compiler, as it was done before and as it requested by trac ticket

Re: Re[2]: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1

2007-04-26 Thread shelarcy
Hello Bulat, I think that builders/distributers use make binary-dist to make binary distribution normally. http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Using#BootstrappingGHC make binary-dist calls prep-bin-dist-mingw to make Windows friendly distribution now.