In the context of the array library, we stumbled over
another problem. Does GHC transitive inlining across
modules? Let's say, we have the following scenario:
module B (foo) where
{-# INLINE foo #-}
foo .. = ...bar...
{-# INLINE bar #-}
bar .. = ...
module L (baz)
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:41:01 +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> PS: I had problems building GHCi and it seems as if my
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't get through
> somehow...
Subject: "mail boot" problem
?
I have got it.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EM
itive inlining
|
|
| In the context of the array library, we stumbled over
| another problem. Does GHC transitive inlining across
| modules? Let's say, we have the following scenario:
|
| module B (foo) where
|
| {-# INLINE foo #-}
| foo .. = ...bar...
|
| {-# INLINE bar #
Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> Yes, all the inlining you expect should indeed happen. If
> it doesn't can you show us an example?
Meanwhile, I think, the lack of inlining that I saw isn't
connected to modules. Instead, the problem is that GHC
thinks it knows more about my progr
"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> Meanwhile, I think, the lack of inlining that I saw isn't
> connected to modules. Instead, the problem is that GHC
> thinks it knows more about my program than I do. More
> precisely, it seems to take an INLINE pragma just as an
> encourag
"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
[..]
> In
> particular - at least if a function is large enough - it
> doesn't inline the function anymore if the function is used
> more than once.
Moreover, I am wondering which the exact conditions are
under which NOINLINE pragmas are igno
