Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Now, the question is: does QNX use the same ABI as Linux on ARM? See ARM EABI notes in includes/stg/MachRegs.h Karel On 01/24/13 11:59 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 07:26 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 24/01/13 16:58, Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 04:50 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I was only able to get

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 11:59 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >> On 01/24/2013 07:26 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >>> Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Can you run it in gdb and loock what the backtrace looks like? >> Did you compile with -debug?

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 07:26 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Can you run it in gdb and loock what the backtrace looks like? Did you compile with -debug? I remember I got a stack trace with gdb like this (when doing

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Hi all, Can people please file bugs about these issues when they are confirmed to some degree? Lots of ARM & LLVM stuff seems to just be floating around mailing lists much higher chance of me or someone else fixing if there are filed bug reports with test cases and/or patches attached. Austin

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 07:26 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >> On 01/24/2013 07:00 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >>> Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: On 01/24/13 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >>> So, not sure on the right solution, but when

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 07:00 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: On 01/24/13 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: So, not sure on the right solution, but when I add -lcapsthen the linker errors go away and I can bui

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 07:00 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: On 01/24/13 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: :( Can you run it in gdb and loock what the backtrace looks like? I can maybe get a core file and load

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 07:00 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: >> On 01/24/13 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >>> Doing a registered build with llvm-3.0 I eventually get: >>> In function `c58Y_info': >>> /tmp/ghc21061_0/ghc21061_0.bc:(.text+0x42d4): undefined re

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/13 06:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: But the symbol not found is __aeabi_memcpy, not memcpy itself ... I can not find __aeabi_memcpy in the ghc source ... Maybe it is not linking some requi

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: On 01/24/13 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Doing a registered build with llvm-3.0 I eventually get: In function `c58Y_info': /tmp/ghc21061_0/ghc21061_0.bc:(.text+0x42d4): undefined reference to `__aeabi_memcpy' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: But the symbol not found is __aeabi_memcpy, not memcpy itself ... I can not find __aeabi_memcpy in the ghc source ... Maybe it is not linking some required library? I'm not sure. Most curious is tha

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/13 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Doing a registered build with llvm-3.0 I eventually get: "inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -o utils/hsc2hs/dist-install/build/tmp/hsc2hs -static -H64m -O0 -fllvm -hide-all-packages -i -iutils/hsc2hs/. -iutils/hsc2hs/dist-install/build -iutils/hsc2hs/dist-in

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: (...) So... it can't find memcpy for some reason? I'm about to try with llvm-3.2 to see if that's different. The solution for me was to wrap mkfifo (in a function I called __mkfifo) and used that

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 05:51 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: (...) > > So... it can't find memcpy for some reason? > > I'm about to try with llvm-3.2 to see if that's different. > I had similar problems with mkfifo. I believe the reason was, that in the android nkd mkfifo is inlined. The solution for me

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 05:04 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: > On 01/24/13 04:50 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >> Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >>> On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >> Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? > Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I wa

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 04:50 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >> On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I was only able to get an unregisterised build

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I was only able to get an unregisterised build to work.

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/13 04:50 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I was only able to get an unregisterised build to work.

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? Yes. With llvm version 3.1 I was only able to get an unregisterised build to work.

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >> On 01/24/2013 03:58 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: >>> Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: With the current ghc HEAD and llvm version 3.2 I am able to do a registerised build for an

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: On 01/24/2013 03:58 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: With the current ghc HEAD and llvm version 3.2 I am able to do a registerised build for android! Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/24/2013 03:58 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: >> Hey, >> >> For me thinks have changed. >> With the current ghc HEAD and llvm version 3.2 I am able to do a >> registerised build for android! > > Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Hey, For me thinks have changed. With the current ghc HEAD and llvm version 3.2 I am able to do a registerised build for android! Do you think it is specifically the 3.2 that made it work? -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Hey, For me thinks have changed. With the current ghc HEAD and llvm version 3.2 I am able to do a registerised build for android! I have not tested much, but Hello World works. Regards, Nathan On 01/14/2013 06:15 PM, Nathan Hüsken wrote: > In a different thread (Error building ghc on raspberry pi

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 19/01/13 07:32, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Was that an registerised or unregisterised build? Did anyone succesfully build ghc on an arm system which produces non crashing executables? Just finally

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/20/13 07:39 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: I just build 7.6.1 release on my ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS which is hard-float ABI distro. I used distro provided LLVM 3.0 and configured GHC with: Please keep in mind that GHC HEAD is completely different beas

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Karel Gardas wrote: I just build 7.6.1 release on my ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS which is hard-float ABI distro. I used distro provided LLVM 3.0 and configured GHC with: Please keep in mind that GHC HEAD is completely different beast as there is new codegen put on by defaul ther

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/19/13 11:37 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: Hi, I just build 7.6.1 release on my ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS which is hard-float ABI distro. I used distro provided LLVM 3.0 and configured GHC with: ./configure --with-llc=/usr/bin/llc-3.0 --with-opt=/usr/bin/opt-3.0 Also the testsuite results run by:

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Hi, I just build 7.6.1 release on my ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS which is hard-float ABI distro. I used distro provided LLVM 3.0 and configured GHC with: ./configure --with-llc=/usr/bin/llc-3.0 --with-opt=/usr/bin/opt-3.0 And resulting ghc-stage2 is not only able to complete the build but also build

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Ben Gamari wrote: Stephen Paul Weber writes: Trying that gives me: Warning: Couldn't figure out LLVM version! Make sure you have installed LLVM ghc: could not execute: opt-3.0 I'm using LLVM 3.1. Are you certain the opt-3.0 is in $PATH? It isn't installed

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Stephen Paul Weber writes: > Trying that gives me: > > [ 1 of 68] Compiling Distribution.Compat.Exception ( > libraries/Cabal/Cabal/Distribution/Compat/Exception.hs, > bootstrapping/Distribution/Compat/Exception.o ) > Warning: Couldn't figure out LLVM version! > Make sure you have inst

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

I got this error too. In my case it helped to install llvm-3.0 next to llvm (in ubuntu the executables are than called llc-3.0 and opt-3.0). I believe this error just came in the first phase, and was caused by the preinstalled ghc-7.4.2. But I am not sure. On 01/19/2013 07:45 AM, Stephen Paul Web

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Was that an registerised or unregisterised build? Did anyone succesfully build ghc on an arm system which produces non crashing executables? Just fi

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Was that an registerised or unregisterised build? Did anyone succesfully build ghc on an arm system which produces non crashing executables? Just finally got a BB10 device set up so I can test my cro

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

Somebody claiming to be Nathan Hüsken wrote: Was that an registerised or unregisterised build? Did anyone succesfully build ghc on an arm system which produces non crashing executables? Just finally got a BB10 device set up so I can test my cross-compiler on the ARM and I get: Process 267265

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/14/13 08:49 PM, Austin Seipp wrote: Very true. It would be very nice if we could handle this issue automatically after we figure out the proper way to handle it manually. I think Karel is right that we may be able to get 90% of the way there with a short hack in DriverPipeline, with some

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

(CC'ing glasgow-haskell-users, as it got lost somehow. A message or two from me and Karel are also missing the list.) On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Ben Gamari wrote: > Austin Seipp writes: > >> I've been working on ARM the past weekend. Here's where I'm at >> (semi-long email ahead.) >> > I'v

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

On 01/14/13 06:15 PM, Nathan Hüsken wrote: In a different thread (Error building ghc on raspberry pi): On 01/08/2013 12:27 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote:(...) I did eventually finish building stage2, but the final executable segfaulted on start. I haven't investigated much why that happened, the

Re: any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

hi nathan, On Jan 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Nathan Hüsken wrote: > Did anyone succesfully build ghc on an arm system which produces non > crashing executables? > > I am asking, because I build a arm-linux-androideabi cross compiler, but > the executables crash. > Only in an unregisterised build, the

any successfull ghc registerised builds on arm?

In a different thread (Error building ghc on raspberry pi): On 01/08/2013 12:27 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote:(...) > > I did eventually finish building stage2, but the final executable segfaulted on start. > I haven't investigated much why that happened, the days it takes to rebuild it just > made me