Folks,
While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the information was
not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
gotten back with the required details.
Ideally we should close these bugs sayin
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Folks,
>
> While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
> which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the information was
> not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
> gott
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:43:15 +0100
Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are
> > few BZs which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the
> > information was not s
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:22:56 +0530
Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
> +1 to the idea of closing a bug if we dont get required information
> in a stipulated time frame. However I would suggest a more lenient
> time frame i.e. at least 4 weeks. That gives ample time for the
> reporter to respond. I think
Hi Atin,
FMPOV, 2 weeks time looks to be good, at the same time, please give
importance for the product version it is reported. If they are into our
running stable or near versions, we can be some more flexible.
--Humble
--Humble
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Folks
