Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> But I just realized the change is wrong, since running tests "new way"
> stops on first failed test. My change just retry the failed test and
> considers the regression run to be good on success, without running next
> tests.
>
> I will post an update shortly.
Done:
ht
Niels de Vos wrote:
> > 2) Spurious failures
> > I added a retry-failed-test-once feature so that we get less regression
> > failures because of spurious failures. It is not used right now because
> > it does not play nicely with bad tests blacklist.
> >
> > This will be fixed by that changes:
>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:55:49PM +0100, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Here are the problems identified in NetBSD regression so far:
>
> 1) Before starting regression, slave compains about "vnconfig:
> VNDIOCGET: Bad file descriptor" and fails the run.
>
> This will be fixed by that c
Hello all
Here are the problems identified in NetBSD regression so far:
1) Before starting regression, slave compains about "vnconfig:
VNDIOCGET: Bad file descriptor" and fails the run.
This will be fixed by that changes:
http://review.gluster.org/13204
http://review.gluster.org/13205
2) Spuri
