Hello everyone,
is there any method to check, if the bricks are in sync?
Thanks and Regards
Tobi
--
Tobias Matthaeus
Technik t...@carmunity.de
Carmunity.com GmbHhttp://www.carmunity.de
Mary-Astell-Str. 2 T: +49-421-6265 130
On 09/29/2011 10:49 AM, Tobias Matthaeus wrote:
Hello everyone,
is there any method to check, if the bricks are in sync?
Thanks and Regards
Tobi
I usually compare the sizes of df of each brick.
However, that doesn't necessarily mean that they are in perfect sync.
On 08/09/11 23:51, Dan Bretherton wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Dan Bretherton
d.a.brether...@reading.ac.uk mailto:d.a.brether...@reading.ac.uk
wrote:
On 17/08/11 16:19, Dan Bretherton wrote:
Dan Bretherton wrote:
On 15/08/11 20:00,
Hi
I have two (replicated) nodes, running ver 3.2.1. The OS disk on one of
them died, so I reinstalled and followed this guide:
http://europe.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Brick_Restoration_-_Replace_Crashed_Server
The guide worked, sort of, as my existing
Gerald,
This should work. Geo-replication is separate for regular replication. Once
you have fixed the replication by putting the new hardware in place and
performing the replace-brick operation, you will want to trigger a self heal:
Hi,
If I have a gluster system sitting on top of ext4 with RAID5, will expanding
the RAID5 with another disk, and resizing the ext4 partition, automatically be
noticed by gluster?
I would:
1. take down a replica brick
2. add the physical disk
3. Restart system
4. stop gluster
5. and unmount
Hi,
With a Linux NFS client there are attribute caching options (eg,
ac/noac). Are there any attribute caching options for the native
glusterfs client? Or something similar?
I'm hoping to improve performance of a web application that accesses
many files stored on a gluster filesystem during a
been reading this thread - quite fascinating.
zfsonlinux + gluster looks like an intriguing combination. i'm interested
in your findings to date; specifically would the zfs L2ARC (with SSDs) speed
up underlying gluster operations? it sounds like it could be a potent mix.
regards,
-paul
On 09/29/2011 12:38 PM, paul simpson wrote:
been reading this thread - quite fascinating.
zfsonlinux + gluster looks like an intriguing combination. i'm
interested in your findings to date; specifically would the zfs L2ARC
(with SSDs) speed up underlying gluster operations? it sounds like it
hey joe,
recived the legal issues loud and clear - all very good points. hope these
issues will become clarified in due course.
putting the legal issues aside - still v keen to hear your and others
thoughts about ZFSL2ARC being a good platform for glusterfs. that fast SSD
tier sounds like a
On 09/29/2011 01:44 PM, David Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:32 PM, David Miller davi...@gmail.com
mailto:davi...@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't you accomplish the same thing with flashcache?
https://github.com/facebook/flashcache/
I should expand on that a little bit.
11 matches
Mail list logo