. But I wouldn't certainly recommend
this kind of setup.
v
>
> regards,
> John
>
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Regar
bly for the
> > number of threads ?
> >
> > Many thank's for all ,
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Pierre Léonard
> >
> >
> > Senior IT Manager
&
ex.php/Getting_started_rrqsg
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Merry Xmas to all Gluster-ers :)
And all the best for New Year 2015
v
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster
l 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
> > On 07/09/2014 10:09 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> On Gluster website I can see section "Language bindings" for the
> >> libgfapi C library for Java/Python/.. However
Hi all,
On Gluster website I can see section "Language bindings" for the
libgfapi C library for Java/Python/.. However I cannot find any
documentation of the interface itself.
Are there any docs on how to use libgfapi using C?
thanks
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet E
ou guys know
v
On Mon 30 Jun 2014 09:54:21, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 06/30/2014 07:35 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> >On the same note, I've just got .src RPM for 3.4.4 and the patch is not
> >there. From the email trail it seems that it's not officially backported
>
luster-users@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> _______
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Regards
Viktor Vi
be a preferred language of choice
but C would be ok too, or Python.
I'll have a look thru the docs and will possibly ask more questions
about this.
v
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 10:33:50, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 25/03/2014, at 11:06 PM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> &g
Hi all,
are there any docs for GlusterFS 3.4.2 and its API? I've been looking
around but cannot find anything. I saw post with the same question for
GFs3.3 but the links there no longer exist..
Would anybody have any good links, tips?
v
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Int
ter-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@gluster.org
> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
e are "glusterd" processes.
>
> I'm making an assumption but I'd suspect that the regular nagios checks are
> resulting in the increase in zombie processes as they are querying the
> glusterd process. The command that the nagios plugin is running is:
>
> #Check heal status
> gluster volume heal audio info
>
y to configure so the
> web server in WA definitely gets data from the brick in WA?
>
> Thanks
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Int
roup (block 0)!
> > EXT4-fs (sdb1): group descriptors corrupted!
> >
> >
> > sorry for my poor EN~~
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@gluster.org
> > http://supercol
tion and manual
interverntion is expected.
I did find on the internet split-brain howtos which follow my path of
execution.
Any suggestions on how to break replicated/distributed setup?
v
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
_
one and setting the
> other to zero, and I tried changing them to both to zero. In
> between each of these, I did a stat on the directory via the FUSE
> mount. It did not change the heal info output.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@gl
Some of the other 'linkto' files do point to the correct location
though.. I guess I should not delete those :)
v
On Tue 04 Mar 2014 09:28:39, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> Also I should say that all bricks still have plenty of free space, but
> there were network pro
7;s
nothing I can do to fix this with heal, rebalance and friends.
I think I'm just gonna delete them..
v
On Sat 01 Mar 2014 17:38:01, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after rebalance with distributed replicated volume setup I'm left with
> files with sticky bit
Also I should say that all bricks still have plenty of free space, but
there were network problems in the LAB..
On Tue 04 Mar 2014 09:26:23, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> I've found this
>
> [r...@gluster01.uat ~]# getfattr -dm .
> Alien3_1992_25_HLS_layer2_642000_282.ts
>
eg
-T 2 1000 1000 0 Feb 28 23:53
ThePinkPanther2_2009_23_HLS_layer4_145_89.ts
somehow I don't think this is expected. Rebalance does not change
anything and all shows as things are ok... but are they?
Anybody has any pointers for this?
--
Regards
Viktor Vi
running rebalance again with 'force' did the trick :)
On Fri 28 Feb 2014 22:32:17, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> After rebalance I have about 1000 'skipped' files out of about 17500.
> I've tried 3 times and the rebalance never finishes completely :(
>
> Now
son. I do
understand what happened but my question is what to do now to fix this?
Running rebalance again makes no difference
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Glust
localhost
gluster01.uat
Is this right?
v
On Fri 28 Feb 2014 08:45:37, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 02/28/2014 07:04 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> >Also I should add here that I'm doing this on VMs. However the rebalance
> >with 3.2.5 was done on the same VMs
> >
&g
nnot tell how long it should take, however, I recon that
4 days is too much. Fix-layout it much quicker then the actuall
rebalance of files.
v
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Viktor Villafuerte <
> viktor.villafue...@optusnet.com.au> wrot
Yes, this works
thanks
On Thu 27 Feb 2014 10:24:25, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> Thanks everybody for the answers!
> I'll follow the suggestions outlined below.. when the LAB here is back
> up :O
>
> v
>
>
> On Wed 26 Feb 2014 09:57:31, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
&
Also I should add here that I'm doing this on VMs. However the rebalance
with 3.2.5 was done on the same VMs
v
On Thu 27 Feb 2014 17:16:55, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> Hi Shylesh,
>
> yes the log showing files being processed and eventually the rebalance
> completed (with skip
nts went in for 3.4 so it should be
> > faster than 3.2.
> > Just to make sure what's happening could you please check rebalance logs
> > which will be in
> > /var/log/glusterfs/-rebalance.log and check is there any
> > progress ?
> >
> > Thanks,
>
rovements went in for 3.4 so it should
> be faster than 3.2.
> Just to make sure what's happening could you please check rebalance
> logs which will be in
> /var/log/glusterfs/-rebalance.log and check is there any progress ?
>
> Thanks,
> Shylesh
>
> Viktor Villafue
Anybody can confirm/dispute that this is normal/abnormal?
v
On Tue 25 Feb 2014 15:21:40, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have distributed replicated set with 2 servers (replicas) and am
> trying to add another set of replicas: 1 x (1x1) => 2 x (1x1)
>
> I h
ver.
>
> If you only want to stop all processes from one server, I don't know
> any other way than manually killing gluster processes.
>
> Xavi
>
> El 26/02/14 03:33, Viktor Villafuerte ha escrit:
> >Ok.. so you claim this is a feature :)
> >So, how do you sto
8.uat g34]#
On Wed 26 Feb 2014 13:50:40, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got these packages installed
>
> [r...@gluster04.uat g34]# rpm -qa | grep gluster
> glusterfs-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
> glusterfs-cli-3.4.2-1.el6.x86_64
> glusterfs-libs-3.4.2-1.el6.x
sure that this is not by design? Is there a way how to fix this? Or
what would be the recommended series of action(s) that should be taken
now to rectify this?
v
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
___
Gluster-use
gt;
> On February 25, 2014 3:23:31 PM PST, Viktor Villafuerte
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've got the same problem here. I did a completely new installation (no
> >upgrades) and when I do 'service glusterd stop' and after 'status' it
> >gives
the sender is strictly prohibited by law. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and
> destroy all copies.
> **
> ___
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@glu
ck with the
v3.2.5 as it seems way quicker.
Please, let me know if there is any 'well known' option/way/secret to
speed the rebalance up on v3.4.2.
thanks
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
___
Gluste
35 matches
Mail list logo
