Have you considered the disperse volume? We'd normally advocate 6 servers
for a +2 redundancy factor though.
Paul C
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:47 AM, wrote:
> Gluster users,
>
> I am looking to implement GlusterFS on my network for large, expandable,
> and redundant storage.
>
> I have 5 servers
On 09/14/2015 10:47 AM, aa...@ajserver.com wrote:
simple replication
that requires at least 3 of the 5 bricks have a copy of the data so I can
lose any 2 bricks without data loss.
This is not possible with GlusterFS, you have to specify up front which
brick has which replica.
I have tried r
Gluster users,
I am looking to implement GlusterFS on my network for large, expandable,
and redundant storage.
I have 5 servers with 1 brick each. All I want is a simple replication
that requires at least 3 of the 5 bricks have a copy of the data so I can
lose any 2 bricks without data loss. I