Diane,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:31 PM, DEP/Dodo wrote:
>
>> The Google Product Forums are a bit different than regular Google Groups.
>> *How so? I mean other than not revealing posters' e-mail addresses.
>> *
>>
>
Here are some differences.
The *Gmail-Help Google Group* (this group) is
This and the Gmail forum are the only groups with which I'm presently
involved. I would prefer my e-dress not be revealed, but I am pleased to
say that so far, no "funny stuff" (that isn't funny) has occurred.
*~Diane*
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Kenneth Ayers
wrote:
> Diane,
>
> The Goo
Diane,
The Google Product Forums are a bit different than regular Google Groups.
I believe you're correct in that email addresses are not revealed there.
But do be careful if you post to any Google Groups and are expecting that
your email address will not be revealed as that isn't the case.
Kenne
As one member of that group wrote: "You can see your e-mail address on
your page, but you can't see anyone else's. Likewise, I can see my e-mail
address on my page, but not on anyone else's (like yours)."
I have provided three screen shots: #1: what I see in Gmail of a poster's
ID; #2: What I
Woke up, couldn't go back to sleep, so here I am. Just tried again to set
up phone number to receive verification code per the first two steps of
enabling 2-step. Again got the message of having exceed the number of
allowed attempts and to "try again later." I thought this was "later."
Kenneth,
Kenneth, thank you for that information! I am relieved to learn it,
particularly with all the problems I've had merely setting up 2-step
verif. Others' comments had led me to think otherwise. However, I'm
deferring to *you*!
*~Diane*
“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Kenneth Ayers
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:46 PM DEP/Dodo wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Kenneth Ayers
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Diane,
>>>
>>> When you didn't get the phone call, did you try clicking on that link in
>>> step 2 which says "Didn't g
Good question. That happened when 2-step was enabled in the strange way I
tried to describe several hours ago. I failed to mention that I had gone
back to using my husband's cell #. That was because I don't want to use it
*and* I figured that would only encourage people to tell me to give up and
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Marko Vukovic
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:49 AM, DEP/Dodo wrote:
>
>>
>> OK. Then I guess it can only be as Kenneth suggests, that perhaps you
> have some call barring enabled on your landline.
> *No. In fact, I have received calls this way involvi
