Torbjörn,
> we mean "faster than GMP's conversion functions", but still using GMP for
> the
> low-level operations.
>
> Then please say so in the paper.
indeed that was not clear, we will say it in the revised version.
Paul
___
gmp-devel
Zimmermann Paul writes:
we mean "faster than GMP's conversion functions", but still using GMP for the
low-level operations.
Then please say so in the paper.
not only. For large operands we believe there is still room to improve our
code. In particular an important part of the total ti
Torbjörn,
> From: Torbjorn Granlund
> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:45:56 +0200
>
> I did a quick first read.
>
> I take it that "faster than GMP" means "faster than GMP's conversion
> functions, using GMP"... Or did you actually beat GMP without GMP?
we mean "faster than GMP's conversion
I did a quick first read.
I take it that "faster than GMP" means "faster than GMP's conversion
functions, using GMP"... Or did you actually beat GMP without GMP?
I cannot recall how the present mpf conversion code works, since I don't
actively develop that.
For integer conversion, the most impo
