On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, at 2:03pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> But anyway, the "List-Id" header is guaranteed to be present and the same
>> for all messages delivered through this mailing list. So, one should
>> filter on that, and not anything else, to identify list mail.
>
> This is a point worth
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:44:01AM -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> There's another way to prevent two replies. Use an invalid email
> address. I wonder wh you even bother with this procmail rule as
> you're never going to get private replies from your postings on the
> list.
Presumably you don't
There's another way to prevent two replies. Use an invalid email address.
I wonder wh you even bother with this procmail rule as you're never going
to get private replies from your postings on the list.
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 09:11:09PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> But anyway, the
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 09:11:09PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But anyway, the "List-Id" header is guaranteed to be present and the same
> for all messages delivered through this mailing list. So, one should filter
> on that, and not anything else, to identify list mail.
This is a point w
