On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen
wrote:
> *YouTube*? Heck--after growing up on *movies* like `The Blair Witch Project'
> and *TV shows* like `Battlestar Galactica', all with liberally-applied
> `MTV-style' camerawork, I find anything that's *not* shaky and
> generally lacking i
Ben Scott writes:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> > Doing it well enough for anybody to want to watch is tricky.
>
> Doing it well is hard, agreed. But in this age of shaky, grainy,
> noisy YouTube videos, doing it "good enough" is becoming more viable.
> I've done
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Doing it well enough for anybody to want to watch is tricky.
Doing it well is hard, agreed. But in this age of shaky, grainy,
noisy YouTube videos, doing it "good enough" is becoming more viable.
I've done some proof-of-concept tests and
On 07/26/2011 01:38 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
> if anyone wants, I'd be happy to record a
> meeting.
Doing it well enough for anybody to want to watch is tricky. At least
expect to need a camera-man and a decent zoom lens. A wireless
lavaliere mic is needed for good sound. But then if there's any
es
Ben Scott writes:
>
> That said, in this particular case, we're not missing out on *too*
> much. I don't think I've been to a LUG meeting in some time that
> didn't have several people with high def video cameras built-in to
> their handheld computers (AKA "cell phones"). One advantage of such
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile)
wrote:
> ... if GNHLUG meets the requirements for this program ...
It does not: "This donation is available to nonprofits with
501(c)(3) designation..."
It finally happened. People had been threatening for years that we
might miss
