Re: gpointing-device-settings

2009-03-04 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 03 mars 2009 à 20:01 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee a écrit : > 2009-03-03 klockan 19:11 skrev Gabor Kelemen: > > Daniel Nylander írta: > > > tis 2009-03-03 klockan 18:32 +0100 skrev Daniel Nylander: > > >> I found out that gpointing-device-settings doesn't seem to be in DL. > > > .. and mousetr

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Anna Jonna Armannsdottir
On mið, 2009-03-04 at 14:47 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > It'd be interesting to look at what happened this cycle and > see how much of the breaks had no request (and were for completely new > strings, and not to mark existing strings translatable). Yes, it is probably best to wait and see what hap

Re: String additions to 'ekiga.HEAD'

2009-03-04 Thread Damien Sandras
Le mercredi 04 mars 2009 à 14:55 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : > I wrote: > > > > There have been following string additions to module 'ekiga.HEAD': > > > > > > + "Calls history" > > > + "The history of the 100 last calls" > > > > > > Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string free

Re: String additions to 'libgweather.HEAD'

2009-03-04 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mercredi 04 mars 2009 à 13:43 +, GNOME Status Pages a écrit : > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > There have been following string additions to module 'libgweather.HEAD': > > + "City in Wyoming, United States"::"Wyoming" >

Re: String additions to 'ekiga.HEAD'

2009-03-04 Thread Frederic Peters
I wrote: > > There have been following string additions to module 'ekiga.HEAD': > > > > + "Calls history" > > + "The history of the 100 last calls" > > > > Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it > > might be worth investigating. > > We are currently in string

Re: [Fwd: Re: String additions to 'libgweather.HEAD']

2009-03-04 Thread Dan Winship
Claude Paroz wrote: > Dan, > > The fuzzy with Bordeaux is fixed, but there is still a problem with > Wyoming which did not get back the "State in United States" msgctxt. Should be fixed now. Sorry. -- Dan ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.or

Re: String additions to 'ekiga.HEAD'

2009-03-04 Thread Frederic Peters
Hello Damien, GNOME Status Pages wrote: > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > There have been following string additions to module 'ekiga.HEAD': > > + "Calls history" > + "The history of the 100 last calls" > > Note that this doe

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 04 mars 2009, à 12:21 +, Anna Jonna Armannsdottir a écrit : > On þri, 2009-03-03 at 14:41 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > I would also point out that having no freeze break (with requests from > > the developers, of course) would be bad: having some breaks is a good > > sign, showing

String additions to 'ekiga.HEAD'

2009-03-04 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'ekiga.HEAD': + "Calls history" + "The history of the 100 last calls" Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it might

String additions to 'libgweather.HEAD'

2009-03-04 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'libgweather.HEAD': + "City in Wyoming, United States"::"Wyoming" + "State in United States"::"Wyoming" Note that this doesn't directly indicate a

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee: > Personally, I think we're doing quite well for this cycle, with most freeze > breaks happening early in the cycle. It would be interesting to see how many > strings have been changed after the string freeze came into effect, and

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-03-04 klockan 13:21 skrev Anna Jonna Armannsdottir: > On þri, 2009-03-03 at 14:41 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > I would also point out that having no freeze break (with requests from > > the developers, of course) would be bad: having some breaks is a good > > sign, showing that the developme

Re: Here we go again *SIGH*

2009-03-04 Thread Anna Jonna Armannsdottir
On þri, 2009-03-03 at 14:41 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > I would also point out that having no freeze break (with requests from > the developers, of course) would be bad: having some breaks is a good > sign, showing that the development is active and not dead. Of course, > we > don't want tons of f

Re: Totem branched for 2.26

2009-03-04 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-03-04 klockan 08:39 skrev Deniz Koçak: > 2009/3/4 Philip Withnall : > > Totem's branched for GNOME 2.26. The branch name is "gnome-2-26". > > Development will continue on trunk. > l10n.gnome.org updated. Thanks. Hi Deniz, It seems like you added the branch, but did not link to it from the Gn