$B$*Aj

2005-08-03 Thread info
$B!y%*!<%k%-%c%j%""M!!(Bhttp://www.awg1.net/?carrier1 $B'X(B $B5U1gAj[EMAIL PROTECTED])(B $B"(G($l$KG($l$^$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>1J5WE*$K2?;~$G$b2?=h$G$b40A4L5NA$G$N>R2pCW$7$^$9!#(B $B"($J$<[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-$NJ}$+$iNA6b$rD:[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B!y8xL30w"M!!(Bhttp://www.awg1.net/?carrier

Re：ご注文確認

2005-08-03 Thread 恵理
【逆援助指名受信メール1件】届きました。 『名前』：志穂 『年齢』：32歳 『職業』：自営業 『年収』：5000万円 『援助』：出来ます 『写真』：あり 『内容』：今日会いたいです。 『一言』：男性との出会いがありません。遊び相手になってもらえませんか？ 　メル友でもいいし、電話友達でもいいんですけど、 　今は買い物に付き合って欲しいかな。何かプレゼントします☆彡 ☆こちらから無料返信☆ http://cutybee.hosting-geomax.jp/secret.php?pr=ext458 ※現在、志穂さんからの指名メールは貴方様への一通のみとなっております。 ☆yaho

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Bruce Lewis wrote: [...] > http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#103 http://groups.google.de/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/50a5eb95d9c8a423 regards, alexander. ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Bruce Lewis wrote: [...] > Since the BSD license allows code to be used for any purpose, the > purpose of creating a derivative work and distributing it under a > different license is allowed. Use is irrelevant because as far as copyright is concerned, it is permitted per 17 USC 117 and the

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Bruce Lewis
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Drivative works of BSD'd code (derivative literary works [modulo the AFC > test] under copyright law) are subject to BSD. That's really interesting. What legal jurisdiction are you in? U.S. law is different. Here, derivative works have separate c

Re: What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
beirne wrote: > > I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to figure > something out. I know the FSF believes that free software is the > correct form of licensing, but does the FSF formally advocate the > elimination of copyright laws that allow for non-free software? http:

Re: What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread David Kastrup
"beirne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to > figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free software is > the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF formally advocate > the elimination of copyright laws that allow for non-f

Re: What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread Eric Eide
"beirne" == beirne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: beirne> I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to beirne> figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free beirne> software is the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF beirne> forma

What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread beirne
I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free software is the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF formally advocate the elimination of copyright laws that allow for non-free software? ___

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Steve wrote: > > > Drivative works of BSD'd code (derivative literary works [modulo the AFC > > test] under copyright law) are subject to BSD. In source code form, such > > derivative works are subject to BSD and only the BSD -- you simply can't > > modify/extend/etc. original license (unless you

$B%;%C%/%9%+%&%s%;%i!

2005-08-03 Thread info
$B"(5.J}$bM=LsBT$A$N%+%j%9%^=PD%%[%9%H$rL\;X$7$F8+$^$;$s$+!*(B $B!V<}F~(BUp$B$G2wE,[EMAIL PROTECTED](B...$B!W(B http://www.awg1.net/?favorite [EMAIL PROTECTED]/=PD%%[%9%H$+$i855$$Jhttp://www.awg1.net/?favorite [EMAIL PROTECTED]&6H$O!W(B [EMAIL PROTECTED](B/[EMAIL PROTECTED];@8(B/[EMAIL P